El Niño 1877 didn't kill 60 million: Myth vs. reality of 'super El Niño'
A tweet antiestéticaturing a vividly colored map has reignited alarm: "The most intense El Niño in history is forming," promising 60 million deaths, just like in 1877. But that figure, repeated like a mantra, fails to withstand even basic scrutiny against historical evidence. What truth lies behind the panic?
The 60 million figure: Viral engineering
The 1876-1878 event was one of the strongest recorded El Niños, causing devastating droughts in India, China, Brazil, and Southern Africa. Millions did die of starvation, yes, but modern studies place total mortality far below 60 million. Detailed analysis of directly affected areas (Peruvian coast, Ecuador, northern Chile) shows these regions had populations under 1.5 million, with generous estimates of local deaths not exceeding 50,000. Most victims stem from the Great Indian Famine of 1876-1878, worsened by British colonial administration which continued exporting grain while people starved. Attributing these deaths solely to El Niño is an exercise in biased simplification.
What now? What models say
Current climate models suggest a new El Niño may be forming. However, Spain's State Meteorological Agency (AEMET) indicates no significant impact expected during summer 2026, noting its relationship with Spanish weather is variable and weak. If the event consolidates as strong, autumn 2026 could be more dynamic and winter 2026-2027 wetter than normal, with risks of DANA storms, but nothing resembling a global catastrophe.
The lesson is old: a colored map is not a death forecast. Behind the noise, data calls for moderation, not fire.
Related forum discussions