City Penthouse or Suburban Townhouse: Which Suits You Best?

A 170 sqm city penthouse for €170,000 versus a four-story suburban townhouse with a pool for €190,000. The choice depends on lifestyle priorities.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

City Penthouse or Suburban Townhouse: Which Suits You Best?
City Penthouse or Suburban Townhouse: Which Suits You Best?

A 170-square-meter city penthouse in the center for €170,000 or a four-story suburban townhouse for €190,000? This dilemma faces a 32-year-old couple planning to have two children, with the answer depending on individual priorities. The penthouse offers a layout described as 'brutal': 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, a 40-square-meter terrace, and spacious rooms. The townhouse includes a pool, garden, two-car garage, and attic, but distributes living space across four floors. The penthouse costs around €1,000 per square meter, a figure that struck some users as notable. The issue lies in what comes after.

Four floors of stairs: the cost not listed in the ad

Advice from those who have experienced it: in a two-story townhouse, you go up and down the stairs between 20 and 30 times a day, and extending this routine to four floors turns daily life into an endurance test. The laundry room and washing area are usually in the basement, clothes are hung downstairs, and bedrooms are upstairs: each load of laundry involves climbing two floors, which no one factors into the mortgage. The basement and garage are not used daily, some note, so calling it four 'real' floors is an exaggeration. But the most repeated warning is not about the present, but the future: those stairs will not be climbed the same way in twenty years.

Here lies the contradiction that portrays the issue. Someone who would not accept a second floor without an elevator out of antiestéticar of the stairs considers a three- or four-story townhouse with complete naturalness. The math does not add up; desire weighs more than arithmetic.

How much does a €100 monthly community fee weigh?

On closer inspection, three-quarters of what twenty years of mortgage payments cost… no: it is €1,200 per year. That is the invisible bill of the penthouse, added to stair meetings, the president, and the building administrator. In return, the townhouse transfers this cost to its own maintenance: mowing the grass frequently, caring for the garden, and maintaining a pool that exists even in winter. In the north, it is pointed out, mowing is frequent, but it can be delegated to someone for little money.

The domestic chapter offers more comparisons. Some defend butane gas canisters for cooking, between €12 and €15 per unit and two to three months of use, compared to natural gas, and others recall that induction cooking is nothing like glass-ceramic. In the penthouse, the heating boiler runs on gas. These are small details that, when added, explain why the decision is not just about the sale price.

The tax deduction for housing that no longer exists

A widespread and mistaken idea: that buying with a mortgage provides tax deductions. It no longer does. As several users recall, the deduction for primary residence only applies to purchases before 2012, and a loan signed today does not generate that right. Those who did deduct in the past remember the mechanism: amortizing each year the exact amount to not exceed the limit of €9,000 between payment and amortization, thus maintaining the benefit while shortening the debt.

The consequence is that the decision weighs more on the immediate pocket and less on fiscal savings. Without this cushion, the €20,000 difference between one option and another ceases to be the argument that settles the discussion.

Neighbors, occupancy, and other fine print

The penthouse accumulates detractors for very earthly reasons: heat, cold, wind, dirt, a difficult garage to enter and exit, and a building opposite that overlooks the terrace. The townhouse is not free. Those with a nearby stream antiestéticar basement flooding, radon must be measured, and dampness checked on lower floors, and in the countryside, birds, rodents, large insects, and unforgiving mowing appear.

Security enters the polls with two opposing narratives. Some see the penthouse as the first target for those climbing between buildings; others consider the isolated townhouse an easier and more exposed target for squatting. Neither antiestéticar is based on data, only on the intuition of those who live in one or the other.

Verdict: no one agrees

Some advised not to choose either house: rent, keep money out of sight, and not be in a hurry, because housing prices were not promising. Against that, the defense of the townhouse appeals to something not listed in any balance: the garden, the hammock, and a place where children grow up outdoors.

And in the crossfire, one user jokingly proposed the option no one had asked for: spending everything on a spelling course if the ad continued writing 'garage' with a 'j'. When two such distinct options generate the same doubts, perhaps the problem is not choosing the wrong house. Whichever it is, someone will end up climbing stairs and paying a community fee. Spoiler: more than you think.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (277 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back