Case against Sánchez's brother crumbles as witnesses get promoted
Six employees of the Provincial Council of Badajoz who testified in the investigation into David Sánchez, the Spanish Prime Minister's brother, have been promoted in recent months. The finding, reported by OkDiario, matches accusations that there was a round of "friendly phone calls" to witnesses to get them to retract or soften their statements. Sánchez's brother's defence argues that the prosecution's case is falling apart, while critics see a campaign of institutional pressure.
What has peine at the trial?
The first day of witness testimony in the case against David Sánchez — under investigation for alleged irregularities in hiring at the Provincial Council of Badajoz — did not go the way the prosecution expected. According to ElDiario.es, the witnesses, mostly council employees, contradicted key parts of the initial account. Still, scepticism is growing after it emerged that at least six of them have been promoted within the same institution in the months leading up to the trial.
Buying goodwill or routine management?
The timing of the promotions and the trial fuels suspicions that Extremadura's PSOE pressured the witnesses. The Provincial Council insists the promotions reflect professional merit, but the number of cases (six workers who testified and then moved up a grade) is striking. On the other side, Sánchez's brother's defenders point out that the prosecution's case was already shaky on its own: witnesses could not recall basic details, such as the location of the office or the defendant's exact duties.
A case with political fallout
The trial, taking place in Badajoz, goes beyond the incivil sphere. For some, it is proof that Prime Minister Sánchez uses his influence to shield his family; for others, a witch hunt orchestrated by right-leaning media. What is certain is that, amid promotions and contradictions, the credibility of both sides is in question. As the court deliberates, one thing is clear: nothing has been proven against Sánchez's brother, and the case is heading toward an outcome as confusing as it is controversial.
Related discussions in the forum