Capgemini and Inetum announce 1,173 layoffs in Spain as AI advances

Capgemini proposes 748 layoffs and Inetum 425 in Spain's first major redundancy plans linked to artificial intelligence. Data and context.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Capgemini and Inetum announce 1,173 layoffs in Spain as AI advances

Two of the largest technology consultancies in Spain, Capgemini and Inetum, have each filed redundancy plans (ERE, the Spanish collective dismissal procedure) affecting a combined 1,173 workers. Capgemini proposes 748 layoffs (7% of its 11,000-strong workforce), while Inetum plans 425 (5% of its own). Both companies justify the cuts with automation and the productivity gains brought by artificial intelligence.

The numbers behind the cuts

According to information published by El Mundo on 23 April 2026, Capgemini plans to lay off 748 of its 11,000 workers in Spain. Inetum, for its part, announced 425 departures. Together they add up to the country's first major tech redundancy plan directly linked to AI. The percentage of affected staff —5% and 7%— shows the impact is not marginal: these are significant cuts to digital services workforces.

Inetum closes with fewer layoffs

On 2 June 2026, Inetum closed its redundancy plan with 10% fewer affected workers than initially planned, according to Muy Computer Pro. This suggests union negotiations or internal adjustments managed to reduce the impact, although the bottom line is that 383 people lost their jobs at the firm.



The recurring argument that AI will create new jobs runs into the reality of the numbers: for now, the jobs it eliminates are concrete, while those it promises are vague. The question is whether these layoffs are the prelude to a bigger wave or a one-off adjustment the sector absorbs through relocations. The next redundancy plans will provide the answer.

Related discussions in the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (4 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back