Bitcoin has surpassed €52,000, exposing those who bet on precious metals. At least, that is what the instigators claim: "Keep buying silver and gold bars... While bitcoin buyers celebrate as the price climbs vertically to €52,000." The provocation goes further. The author admits defeat: "I also trusted gold and silver, and I was wrong too."
The subsequent discussion focuses less on metals and more on an uncomfortable question: why does the average Spanish investor still view cryptocurrency with suspicion when it has traded at prices that would have multiplied any portfolio for years?
Bitcoin at €52,000: The Figure That Stings
Price data anchors the entire debate. The initial message sets bitcoin at €52,000, while a later update notes: "It's already at €90,000... and seems to have no ceiling." The time gap between these references is what hurts most among metal defenders.
A circulating calculation compares traditional bank deposits with minimal crypto entry. To earn €70 net from a three-month deposit in a conventional bank requires immobilizing about €10,000. According to the same logic, obtaining that return by investing in bitcoin two months prior and selling afterward would only require €100. The conclusion: if it fails, the loss is manageable; if it succeeds, the relative return matches the deposit without locking up liquidity.
Others counter with the fine print. Conversion to euros, banking steps, and tax declarations are cited as barriers. Those who have navigated this respond sharply: "I've passed two tax audits declaring crypto assets and faced no issues." The bureaucracy exists but isn't the insurmountable wall some describe.
Why Does Distrust of Bitcoin Persist in Spain?
Distrust has concrete roots. Some argue bitcoin serves the system despite its anti-establishment image: "All banks, several states, and major fortunes already use and trade it." Thus, cryptocurrency is not a threat to financial order but a component of it. This group warns that prices can be manipulated and "when elites decide it should crash, it will fall like other vanished cryptos."
Conversely, the metal argument relies on tangibility. Gold and silver "never lose value in trade," while non-physical assets are "bread today, hunger tomorrow." Criticism of fiat money extends to backing: France’s historical demand for gold-backed dollars revealed paper promises were worthless. The takeaway: state-backed currencies are revisable promises by definition.
Tech-focused counterarguments suggest electromagnetic pulses or blackouts would erase bitcoins but not melt bars. The response notes gold is vulnerable to state expropriation: "The main thief is the state, and stealing your bars from a safe is easier than hacking a bitcoin wallet."
The Calculation No One Reconciles
The debate shifts to real returns. An example cites early buyers of 1,000 bitcoins at negligible prices now holding eight-figure fortunes. The recurring question: where is the problem? Is it inability to sell?
The common answer is timing, not sales. Bitcoin traded near €50,000 in late 2021. Buyers then saw no multiplication. Extraordinary returns concentrated among those entering when values were cents or few dollars. For current entrants, doubling investment is slow at best.
Comparisons arise. Nvidia shares outperformed bitcoin in the same period, according to discussions. Gold retains buyers seeking preservation, not multiplication. The core question remains: is bitcoin an investment or a gamble? A frequent quote: "Investing in Bitcoin is like betting cash in a casino."
The Trap of Selective Memory
Self-awareness emerges when one recalls how critics mocked crypto enthusiasts before mocking metal holders: "Remember those saying 'gold investors at $1,600/oz will lose 40%' and 'Bitcoin will collapse, insiders say'?" Consistency is rare here.
Context explains metal’s hold in Spain: precious metals trading gained popularity recently and requires technical knowledge. Bitcoin, bought via mobile, offers ease—a virtue and a curse.
The exchange ends unresolved. Bitcoin rises, gold stays in safes, each side awaiting the other’s capitulation. Only certainty: early buyers don’t argue; they watch from afar.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (109 replies).
The 2020 thesis for a Spanish market crash relied on calendar cycles, Tesla valuations, and the Buffett Indicator. The month ended without a collapse, leaving doubts.