Berlin Official Advocates for Partial Ban on AfD

The Berlin Justice Senator considers a partial veto against the AfD, but believes total prohibition is unlikely. We analyze the viability.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The Berlin Justice Senator, **Feliz Badenberg**, sees a partial veto against the **AfD** as a legally and politically 'correct' option, although she considers that a total prohibition process is currently 'unpromising'.

## A Partial Ban as an Alternative

The idea of banning a political party always generates debate. In **Berlin**, the Justice Senator, **Feliz Badenberg**, has put on the table the possibility of a partial veto against the **AfD**. The **CDU** policy holds that a total prohibition process against the party is 'unpromising' at this time. However, she views the option of specifically vetoing the party's **Turingia** branch favorably, describing it as 'correct' from both a legal and political point of view. This stance suggests a cautious strategy, seeking concrete points of action in a complex scenario.

## The Path to Prohibition

Procedures for banning a political party in **Germany** are intricate and defined by the Basic Law. They require solid evidence that the party is actively seeking to undermine liberal democratic order. The **AfD** has been under scrutiny by German security authorities, and concerns regarding its extremist positions have been raised. However, proving that the party as a whole operates unconstitutionally is a high threshold. A partial veto, such as that suggested by **Badenberg** for the **AfD** in **Turingia**, could be a more antiestéticasible route, by focusing on specific activities or structures within a particular region.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (7 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back