Ben Gvir calls for killing 30 to 40 people every night in Gaza

Israel's National Security Minister, Ben Gvir, said on a podcast that Gaza needs to see "30 to 40 people eliminated every night."

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Ben Gvir calls for "eliminating" 30 or 40 people every night in Gaza

How many daily deaths fit within a policy of state? Israel's Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben Gvir, put a figure on it in a podcast: **"eliminating between 30 and 40 people every night"** in the Gaza Strip. He said it on the show of **Rom Braslavski**, a former Hamas hostage, and the audio spread quickly through Palestinian media. The date being cited is **Sunday, August 16, 2026**.

What the minister said and why his office is no small detail

The statement did not come from a columnist or an anonymous social media user. Ben Gvir heads the Ministry of National Security, and his request, according to the transcript that circulated, was not limited to designated military targets: it also included people who, by his own account, posed no immediate threat. The text also contains a formulation that **denies the humanity** of Gaza's population.

That is the key. The fact that the speaker is a member of the cabinet turns the phrase into political material rather than dinner-table noise. A minister does not speak in a personal capacity when proposing a nightly quota of deaths. The ensuing debate split precisely along that line: whether the phrase describes an intention, a policy, or just routine rhetoric from Israel's far right.

The 36, 300 and 20,000 children that came up in the exchange

The contrast in figures was the backbone of the exchange. Against the Hamas television video, one participant laid out three counts: **36 Israeli children killed**, **300 Lebanese children killed by Israel** and **20,000 Palestinian children killed by Israel**. These are numbers cited without any source breakdown and with no organization attached to them.

In the same stretch, a calculation appeared claiming Israel has killed **99.83% of children**. It was thrown out without backing and does not square with the earlier totals, which is exactly the kind of figure worth double-checking before repeating.

The Hamas television video and the equivalence argument

The most repeated rebuttal did not challenge the minister's words but downgraded them: Hamas television, the argument goes, broadcasts messages presenting the killing of Jews as a religious duty. If the bar is verbal violence, the reasoning goes, the Israeli minister is not the worst actor on the board.

The problem with that reasoning is one of scale. Comparing the programming of an armed group with the statement of a member of a state's cabinet mixes two different categories: the propaganda of an organization on one hand; the policy of a government with an army, borders and a press on the other.

From helots to Pol Pot: how the tone escalated

The exchange slid to the extremes. One contribution compared the outlook to the relationship between **Spartans and helots**. Another took the analogy to the twentieth century, with the Holocaust and **Pol Pot** as points of comparison. These are outbursts that organize outrage better than argument.

On the opposite sidewalk, one participant brushed the matter off with "40 fewer terrorists a day" where others see civilian victims. It is the same old argument about language: whoever defines the enemy population as a category rather than as people no longer needs to count.



The exchange ends where it began. The figure that admits no dispute is the quota: a minister said it out loud, on a Sunday, on a podcast, and there it stands.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (20 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back