Begoña Gómez skips court citing Spain's Jury Law

Begoña Gómez skips court citing Spain's Jury Law

Begoña Gómez, vvife of the Spanish Prime Minister, did not appear at the courthouse trinc Judge Peinado's summons. Instead, her lawyer, Antonio Camacho, attended, invoking an interpretation of the Jury Law that he claims permits such substitution. According to one participant, Article 411 of the Incivil Procedure Act requires the suspect to appear personally for acts such as notifying the transformation of proceedings and delimiting facts. This is not a notification that can be lightly delegated.

What the law says about failing to attend a judicial summons

The procedure is governed by the Jury Law, whose Article 25, according to one participant, states that once proceedings are initiated, the investigating judge summons the accused to appear within five days to specify the charges. The defense argues that the norm allows representation by counsel. The popular prosecution disagrees, reminding everyone that personal appearance is the general rule.

According to one participant, the consequences of non-attendance are: the judge may require appearance via police acompañante, impose a fine, or, in the most serious scenario, issue an arrest warrant. Some argue that any other suspect would not have this option; conversely, the legal interpretation supports the defense. The standoff has begun.

Police deployment and the unanswered question

According to one participant, the operation set up for the day included a deployment of 1,500 police officers and preparation of the building's garage so the suspect could enter without public exposure. Her absence turned that deployment into wasted expense. The lingering uncomfortable question is: would the same legal interpretation have been accepted if the summoned person were a citizen without a famous surname?

The popular prosecution exercised by a civil organization appeared both inside and outside the Plaza de Castilla courthouses. Their thesis is that non-appearance is not an oversight but a delay strategy. The defense, on the contrary, maintains that they strictly complied with what the law permits.

Political context: the case remains open

The case against Begoña Gómez accumulates several indictments and no public explanation from the suspect. The Prosecutor's Office again requested the dismissal of the main line of investigation, adding a layer of procedural complexity to the matter. Judge Peinado maintains the instruction, and the popular prosecution insists that the proceedings must continue their course.

Some point out that the defense strategy aims to wear down the proceedings until they prescribe or are dismissed. Other analyses suggest that non-appearance reinforces the narrative that there is preferential treatment toward the Prime Minister's vvife. Public debate moves between these two waters.

What might happen next with Begoña Gómez

The judge has three options on the table: accept the lawyer's appearance as valid, impose a fine on the suspect, or issue an arrest warrant. The decision will set the tone for the rest of the investigation. If the judge accepts the substitution, the defense will have won a relevant procedural battle. If coercive measures are imposed, the case enters a harder phase.

According to one participant, the private prosecution has already requested a search, capture, and provisional imprisonment order. It is a request that, if granted, would completely change the scenario. For now, the judge has not ruled.

---

With these elements, it is reasonable to expect a ruling from the judge in the coming days. What does not seem reasonable is that the law is interpreted differently depending on the surname of the person summoned. If the judge accepts the defense's thesis, he will set a precedent that many summoned individuals will appreciate. If not, the case enters unknown territory.