At 65, You Are Just Old: The Anonymous Engineer Who Saved Lives During the DANA

The head of the Plan Sur engineering team, credited with saving lives during the DANA, remains anonymous. A forum debate highlights the generational gap and ageism in Spain.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

At 65, You Are Just Old: The Anonymous Engineer Who Saved Lives During the DANA
At 65, no one remembers the Turia engineer

The head of the Plan Sur engineering team—the Turia river diversion that, according to a forum post, helped save lives during the DANA—has no public name. Only his family and colleagues know him. Meanwhile, the best Spanish athlete gets all the applause. Between these extremes lies a problem raised by a forum user, attributed to men aged 65: it doesn’t matter what you did; you are just old.

This is not an outburst of self-esteem. The conversation that sparked this view paints an uncomfortable portrait: merit without a signature is forgotten, applause fades when the position ends, and age turns anyone into a stranger.

Why does no one remember the Turia engineer who helped save lives?

The specific case serves as proof. The Turia diversion is cited as one of those works that did their job without almost anyone knowing who signed them, and those who remember it argue that the team helped save lives during the DANA and future ones, because the phenomenon is cyclical in the area.

In a village, the teacher has a face; in a city, he does not. This is the argument that best explains the distance: in rural areas, you know the doctor who was, the teacher, and remember them for their good or bad work. In a big city, there is no biography, only anonymity. No one has seen you before. You are just another old person.

The repeated conclusion is harsh: those who are not famous do not transcend. Their life, achievements, and opinions cease to interest anyone but their loved ones.

From Jobs to Ritchie: Who Gets the Credit and Who Does the Work

The system rewards those who sell, not those who build. This summarizes the distribution of fame in a market where those who amass fortunes function as new gods: the public dreams of being Steve Jobs, while in academic circles, Jobs is nobody and Dennis Ritchie is one of the sector’s major figures.

Hence, the underlying complaint. Recognition trades in a different stock market than merit, and the former almost always wins. Moreover, public memory has an expiration date: the next generation remembers no one, however competent they were.

The Broken Relay: When the Elder Becomes a Burden Instead of a Teacher

Here, the tone turns bitter. Part of the conversation argues that the elder stopped being a teacher and became a burden: they receive a pension, accumulate wealth, and, in the best case, get in the way. Pensions of 2,000 euros, two apartments, and 200,000 euros in the bank are cited as reasons for reproach, regardless of having worked since age 14 and contributed for 50 years.

The accusation has a reply. Another part responds that those who dedicated their lives to working do not have to apologize for collecting what they contributed, and that the discontent is not just economic: it is about expectations. The elder is expected to teach and, frequently, offers only nostalgia.

The interesting part is that both sides describe the same rupture. The profession that was once passed from parents to children has ceased to circulate, and with it went the reason why a veteran deserved respect beyond their salary.

What Remains for Those Without Children?

When asked what remains of a person, the most repeated answer is biological: children. Those who do not have them, it is argued, literally leave nothing behind. The most extreme case is a 59-year-old man who says he has left his loved ones eight million euros and still feels reduced to a grandfather whom they only ask for the inheritance.

His bitter summary could fit in an uncomfortable phrase: "Give us the money and die." In response, another part argues that those who do not seek applause do not care if no one remembers them.

The Mirror of Age: From "You" Formal to the Reserved Seat

The conversation also leaves scenes that anyone recognizes. The first time you are addressed as "usted" (formal you), with just turned 20. The day someone gives up their seat on the train, this is more serious. The nurse who tells you that you are the same age as her father. Signs that do not depend on what you have done, only on the calendar.

On top of that, the observation from below. A subordinate recounts how he detects in his boss, twenty years later, lapses and errors that did not exist before, and how he compensates with craft, contacts, and words what his mind no longer provides.

The final scene is signed by an old ossuary: "As you see me, I saw you. As I see you, you will see." Vanity, says the stone. And reason, adds anyone who has visited an old cemetery.

In the end, the shocking fact remains: those who accumulate eight million euros and a lifetime of work suspect that their loved ones are only interested in the inheritance. The engineer who helped save lives will not even have that.]

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (315 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back