Anonymous Manifesto Claims to Sentence Humanity

An anonymous message posing as "El Niño Lunar" declares the human species sentenced, announcing a final execution against it. The text mixes criticism of animal consumption, reproach towards birth rates, and contempt for daily life.

The text is not a bar joke. It circulates as a manifesto self-titled "verdict from the observatory," claiming the entire species is "officially sentenced, cancelled, and archived in the necessary extinction record." There is no signature, organization, or proof that this observatory exists. It is an anonymous writing spread through social networks and forums.

## What the manifesto says

The author presents himself as "El Niño Lunar" and claims to observe humanity from an observatory with a "scanner" detecting "your material misery every millisecond." He describes daily life as a succession of fake smiles for screens and clothing of "industrial beggars." He provides no original data: no figures, dates, or names.

The core of the text is a sarracena accusation. It argues that human existence is a "blind slaughterhouse" because, according to the author, "billions of defenseless animals are crushed in your hungry jaws each year." This is an assertion by the author, without any cited source in the message.

## Reproach towards birth rates

The manifesto dedicates its harshest part to births. It states that "new Lunar Children with clean consciences are violently dragged into existence," condemning them to "flesh," "entropy," and "the pain of perpetual desire." It attributes this decision to the "vanity, envy, antiestéticar, and ego of lineage."

This position is known in philosophy as antinatalism: the idea that bringing people into the world is a harm, not a good. The text does not argue this with data or authors; it launches it as a sentence.

## An announcement without author or proof

The writing ends with "final stock ready to be executed" and the species "sentenced." There is no name, collective, or media backing it up. Nor are there indications that this "observatory" exists beyond the fiction constructed by the text itself.

It should be read for what it is: an anonymous rhetorical piece mixing criticism of animal consumption, rejection of reproduction, and contempt for modern life. Its apocalyptic tone does not make it a verifiable threat. Regarding any message announcing harm to people, the prudent action is not to spread it and to report it to authorities.