Alvise Pérez makes unproven allegations regarding MPs and hotels
Spanish politician Alvise Pérez has leveled unverified claims about MPs' sexual activities in Madrid hotels, sparking debate over media caution and legal risks.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Alvise Pérez makes unproven allegations regarding MPs and hotels
Has it been published yet? That is the question surrounding the latest message from Alvise Pérez, who has brought unproven allegations to light concerning the alleged sensual practices of MPs in hotels near the Congress of Deputies. The message, circulated on social media, explicitly mentions Milhouse and two establishments on Echegaray Street. The reaction was immediate, ranging from absolute skepticism to demands for full disclosure.
The origin: a tweet without verifiable sources
The trigger is a message questioning whether reports have been released regarding sens workers who were allegedly summoned by someone named Milhouse at 3:00 a.m. The accusation goes further, claiming that married MPs from the PSOE (the main socialist party) and both opposition parties took these women to the Hotel Urban and the Gran Hotel Inglés, both located at 8 Echegaray Street, during parliamentary sessions. Not a single piece of evidence has been provided—no names, no dates, and no documents.
way of reacting: "And the source is... birdseed?", one participant summarizes. As it stands, the accusation lacks media traction. No one dares to publish it without risking a lawsuit. The original sender provides nothing more than the question itself.
Media silence and antiestéticar of lawsuits
The discussion quickly shifts to why these types of allegations do not reach the press. The prevailing answer is legal: publishing unproven claims is a gamble in court. "Not even God would publish that... let's see who is brave enough to engage with the rubbish this idiot posts," another message states. Furthermore, the source of the leak does not help, as the sender has a history of confrontations with both the media and those in power.
The focus then moves to the credibility of sources. Cristina Fallarás is mentioned, who in recent days has shared anonymous testimonies regarding alleged sensual behavior by MPs. The comparison is inevitable: if unverified testimonies are given credibility, why not this one? The consensus is that neither has evidentiary support.
The Madrid circle: everyone knows everything
Beyond the specific case, the debate reveals a widespread perception: in Madrid, the political and business worlds share the same restaurants, parties, and nightlife venues. "Everyone knows everything in Madrid; it is a very small circle," one message notes. Specific hotels are cited, and there is talk of espionage and blackmail. It is recalled that attempts were made to spy on Julio Anguita to uncover his secrets, though they were unsuccessful. The conclusion drawn is that hypocrisy is the common denominator.
The conversation also addresses the use of intelligence services to monitor politicians and the ease with which they can be blackmailed. "If you enter politics, your life must be exemplary," one participant asserts. Another adds that similar things could be found on ordinary people, but their secrets interest no one.
The background: double standards and the Errejón case
The thread cannot be understood without the context of the Errejón case, which looms over the entire conversation. Allegations of harassment, anonymous testimonies, and ongoing judicial investigations are mentioned. The question floating around is why some cases come to light while others do not. "What they are demonstrating with the testimonies of recent days is clear: having diverse sensual tastes only counts if you are female by birth or through administrative change," one message ironizes.
The discussion turns to the hypocrisy of those who demand exemplary behavior only to find themselves embroiled in scandals. There is criticism of parties that call for the abolition of prostitution and prono while their MPs allegedly use those very services. The conclusion is bitter: the system protects some and targets others as it suits.
In the end, the question remains unanswered. Has it been published? No. Will it be published? With these sources, not a chance. In the meantime, people continue to wait for blood, scandals, and heads to roll. Everyone is left to draw their own conclusions.
Has it been published yet? That is the question surrounding the latest message from Alvise Pérez, who has brought unproven allegations to light concerning the alleged sensual practices of MPs in hotels near the Congress of Deputies. The message, circulated on social media, explicitly mentions Milhouse and two establishments on Echegaray Street. The reaction was immediate, ranging from absolute skepticism to demands for full disclosure.
The origin: a tweet without verifiable sources
The trigger is a message questioning whether reports have been released regarding sens workers who were allegedly summoned by someone named Milhouse at 3:00 a.m. The accusation goes further, claiming that married MPs from the PSOE (the main socialist party) and both opposition parties took these women to the Hotel Urban and the Gran Hotel Inglés, both located at 8 Echegaray Street, during parliamentary sessions. Not a single piece of evidence has been provided—no names, no dates, and no documents.
way of reacting: "And the source is... birdseed?", one participant summarizes. As it stands, the accusation lacks media traction. No one dares to publish it without risking a lawsuit. The original sender provides nothing more than the question itself.
Media silence and antiestéticar of lawsuits
The discussion quickly shifts to why these types of allegations do not reach the press. The prevailing answer is legal: publishing unproven claims is a gamble in court. "Not even God would publish that... let's see who is brave enough to engage with the rubbish this idiot posts," another message states. Furthermore, the source of the leak does not help, as the sender has a history of confrontations with both the media and those in power.
The focus then moves to the credibility of sources. Cristina Fallarás is mentioned, who in recent days has shared anonymous testimonies regarding alleged sensual behavior by MPs. The comparison is inevitable: if unverified testimonies are given credibility, why not this one? The consensus is that neither has evidentiary support.
The Madrid circle: everyone knows everything
Beyond the specific case, the debate reveals a widespread perception: in Madrid, the political and business worlds share the same restaurants, parties, and nightlife venues. "Everyone knows everything in Madrid; it is a very small circle," one message notes. Specific hotels are cited, and there is talk of espionage and blackmail. It is recalled that attempts were made to spy on Julio Anguita to uncover his secrets, though they were unsuccessful. The conclusion drawn is that hypocrisy is the common denominator.
The conversation also addresses the use of intelligence services to monitor politicians and the ease with which they can be blackmailed. "If you enter politics, your life must be exemplary," one participant asserts. Another adds that similar things could be found on ordinary people, but their secrets interest no one.
The background: double standards and the Errejón case
The thread cannot be understood without the context of the Errejón case, which looms over the entire conversation. Allegations of harassment, anonymous testimonies, and ongoing judicial investigations are mentioned. The question floating around is why some cases come to light while others do not. "What they are demonstrating with the testimonies of recent days is clear: having diverse sensual tastes only counts if you are female by birth or through administrative change," one message ironizes.
The discussion turns to the hypocrisy of those who demand exemplary behavior only to find themselves embroiled in scandals. There is criticism of parties that call for the abolition of prostitution and prono while their MPs allegedly use those very services. The conclusion is bitter: the system protects some and targets others as it suits.
In the end, the question remains unanswered. Has it been published? No. Will it be published? With these sources, not a chance. In the meantime, people continue to wait for blood, scandals, and heads to roll. Everyone is left to draw their own conclusions.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (103 replies).
More summaries
-
PSOE lawsuits against Alvise dismissed: a judicial victory?
The PSOE sees all its lawsuits against Alvise Pérez dismissed. His supporters celebrate while doubts about Timospain and the €100,000 in cash persist.
-
Alvise Pérez: A Year On, No Salary Raffle, No Revelations
A year after joining the European Parliament, Alvise Pérez admits he has not raffled his salary or exposed the frauds he promised. His voters remain silent.
-
Spain's Congress drops 'of Deputies' in name reform
The Congress of Deputies will be renamed simply Congress. The rules reform pushed by PSOE and Sumar cleared its second-to-last step in committee.
-
Turkey's Deposit Freeze: $18 Billion Locked for Investors
Over 500,000 Turkish investors face frozen assets in funds promising triple-digit returns. The freeze blocks withdrawals of $18 billion, sparking Ponzi scheme allegations.
-
Friendship for gain wins out: leisure as a transaction
Friendship based on self-interest bores, while bonds that simply feel good are increasingly rare. Shared leisure as an antidote to social calculation.
-
Spain promises 350 km/h AVE trains its drivers already want to slow down
Spain's transport minister promises 350 km/h high-speed rail while train drivers have already asked to cut speeds to 250 km/h due to track conditions. The real cost of the record.