An AI-generated video circulating on X is presented as a blow to Spain's Vox party. The precedent matters more than the case: if the technique works, any political formation can be exposed.
An AI-generated video circulates on X as an attack against Vox. The spread includes disqualification and a link; there is no independent confirmation of authorship or impact.
## A cheap video hard to attribute
Generative AI makes propaganda cheaper. No studio or actors are needed for a scene that looks real. Costs shift from production to debunking.
On X, a link and disqualification suffice for it to circulate. Authorship becomes diluted.
## Vox, a target with 3,033,744 votes
Vox obtained 3,033,744 votes and 33 seats on July 23, 2023. It has enough electoral mass for negative pieces to seek resonance.
Presenting this as a blow to that party does not prove vote transfer. A viral piece can mobilize, irritate, or pass unnoticed.
## Precedent affecting the left too
If the method damages Vox, it can be used against PSOE, Sumar, or any other acronym. Denouncing the technique does not protect the left.
The European AI Regulation entered into force on August 1, 2024. It requires labeling certain content but does not prevent fakes from circulating before debunking.
Nothing justifies assuming its electoral impact.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (0 replies).
Vox is pushing housing as its central election issue, but its record in Valencia and doubts about its ability to deliver are breeding scepticism among voters.
The neighbour the Spanish government used as its anti-eviction icon was vice-secretary of a company dedicated to investing in properties and renting them out.