33 goals in seven games and then the Clásico: Flick's Barça

From the 29th title to defeat in the Clásico: Flick's Barça

Barcelona's season kicked off with the handball section lifting the club's 50th European Cup —counting all its sections— and with Gavi starting in Spain's World Cup peine against Cape Verde. Between one celebration and the next, the question that orders everything else: how does domestic dominance translate to the continent. The previous season had delivered two domestic trophies, with the 29th La Liga title the most valuable of them, along with the realization that in Europe the level allows no shortcuts. The transfer market was the first exam of the new campaign.

And it was passed only halfway. An academy product on his way to the Bernabéu, a striker who became July's biggest saga, a stalled contract renewal and a backup number nine that was taken for granted. Each front was closed differently and each left a bill, almost always due in October.

Cucurella, the full-back heading to the rival and the door some want to shut

In the thread it was taken as a given that Real Madrid was signing Marc Cucurella for around 60 million fixed, plus some 20 million in wages and a six-year contract. One forum user calculated that, applying the same yardstick once used for Barça signings, the deal with bonuses would reach 70 million. The first argument was not sporting but contractual: it was pointed out that until June 30 the full-back remained a Chelsea player on Chelsea's payroll, apart from the bonus already agreed with the Madrid club.

The resentment has academy roots. A player developed in the youth system, in a position Barça needed to strengthen, ending up at the eternal rival. From there to claiming he should have the door shut on him forever is a stretch: the club has reconciled with figures whose relationships went through far worse moments. On the sporting side, the signing was seen as a good one, though the thread warned that only two state-backed clubs can pay that price.

The detail that hurt came months later, in the Clásico: the Barça winger never once attacked the full-back's flank. That ended the debate about the price.

Why didn't Barça sign Julián Álvarez?

According to the thread's account, plan A had a name and a date. 100 million on the table and a deadline, late July, after which the club would weigh whether to raise the offer or walk away. Atlético didn't budge, and the figures thrown around in the conversation ranged from 120 to 150 million, unaffordable for a club still wrestling with financial fair play. It was expected that the player's willingness would force the move; it didn't happen.

Plan B was discussed as a package. The thread floated Gabriel Jesús for 10 million and a two-year deal, with Arsenal keeping 20% of a future sale; he fit the profile of the mobile striker the system demands, with the usual doubt: his knees. Around him, wingers like Adeyemi and Hamza were mentioned, along with the false nine option.

The disagreement wasn't about the player, it was about the model. The repeated argument was that 120 million for someone who has yet to be a top player endangers the club's finances. Against that weighed a diagnosis repeated throughout the thread: when the ball won't go in, you need an area specialist who pounces on a rebound and turns one point into three.

Ferran Torres, 50 million and a bonus in January

The Ferran Torres case sums up the problem of planning late. His contract is running out and he has a multi-million bonus scheduled for January, according to the thread; with that incentive in hand, no 50-million offer —the ones attributed to PSG and Aston Villa— makes sense to him unless he gives up the bonus. Renewing him was cheap a year ago; in August, expensive. And the team was left without Lewandowski and without a proven replacement.

Around it, the financial engineering the club has carried since 2020. As explained in the thread, De Jong's contract extension was not a sporting bet: it served to spread deferred wage arrears over several years that would otherwise have had to be paid in one lump sum. Something similar was done with Araujo. The result is a squad with high wages, awkward veterans and exits nobody wants to take on.

There was talk of Araujo going out on loan, Ferran negotiating and De Jong an unknown: if he went under the knife, five months out. In defense they relied on academy players and position changes. They asked for a commanding centre-back and full-backs suited to the new project; what arrived, above all, was a fixture list.

33 goals in seven games: the start that sent expectations soaring

With the team in gear, Barcelona put up absurd numbers at the start: 33 goals in seven games, with full-backs popping up through the central channel and up to six or seven players in scoring position in every match. People talked of a hybrid between Flick's Bayern, City and PSG: possession, high pressing and the ability to create chances from any situation, against a low block or in transition.

That's where overconfidence was born. With those numbers, analyzing the team match by match seemed like bad faith. And yet the warning was already written: the defeat in Europe came with the team carried by the goalkeeper and the defense conceding two goals to modest opponents.

The fixture list: four games nobody can play

Between the euphoria and the stumble crept in a complaint shared by everyone. Four straight matches of maximum intensity, international breaks in the middle of the league season, a Nations League forcing internationals to play high-level games in October. Gavi's case with Armenia was cited —unconfirmed in the thread— along with Raphinha's in a friendly, two examples to show the risk doesn't depend on the opponent. De Jong played for the Netherlands with painkiller injections.

The result is a coach who can't rotate where he has no backup. High pressing demands fresh legs and the club built a squad with depth up front and none at the back. That's where the debate began that ended on the bench.

The Clásico and the change nobody understood

The correction came in the worst possible setting. Mbappé scored his tenth goal in ten league matchdays —he now has 13 against Barcelona in his career— after a clearance fell to him loose in the box. The match was lost, according to the most repeated diagnosis, on the bench: De Jong for Fermín in the 60th minute at 1-1, an attacking midfielder without a goal or an assist in a game where the team needed shots.

The criticism wasn't aimed at the player but at the fit. Frenkie can only play as a holding midfielder and, at that pace, barely that. The alternative being called for was different: Raphinha through the middle and an area striker to win the game instead of controlling it.

The underlying debate is physical. The system works with two squads and the club only had one and a half. From "six points clear" they went to three behind after the Clásico, with the Camp Nou arguing about the atmosphere and the crowd booing the build-up play. The season wasn't lost in October, but the feeling of a defining mistake had taken hold.

Referees: two narratives and no resolution

The other thread running through the season was refereeing, with accusations flying both ways. From the Barça side, handballs, shoves and a punch that went unpunished were flagged, with the argument that the criterion is clear: if it's a play on the ball without violence, a yellow card. From the rival bench came complaints about red cards and penalties, and the answer was to point out that protesting doesn't change the criterion.

Intimidation as a factor was also discussed: a team on a run forces the opponent to choose which games to spend. And, as every season, the reference returned to the case of payments to a former vice-president of the referees' committee, with no court ruling to date, along with the retort from a forum user accusing the Madrid club of operating through an opaque corporate structure. None of that gets settled in a stadium.

---

The season split in two: the one being celebrated in August with 33 goals, and the one being argued in October with the gap narrowed after the Clásico. Barcelona let Cucurella slip away, let Julián escape, was negotiating Ferran's exit and discovered that its best player is very young and that the system that makes him shine can't handle four maximum-intensity games in a row. The breakdown of the deals, bonuses and wages included, paints a picture of the market that explains more than any press conference. The Champions League remains, and an unresolved question: whether Flick's system is a style or a physical bill that comes due in October.