"Victory to the Gods!": Hilo sobre Bronze Age Pervert

[Gurney]

61
Crusaders like Cortes and Pizarro, Fernando de Soto, Drake and Raleigh, Magellan and Balboa equal in daring, intelligence, magnitude of spirit, resourcefulness and achievement any of the great men of the Greeks and Romans. The story of the heroic age of exploration remains to be told in full, and maybe one of you one day will make big book or big movies. I say also now: for those who seek to make a difference and have some artistic or visual bent, movies are the golden key to the minds of the many. What Mel Gibson does is worth a thousand books or “activisms” for your side. Learn to make movies, if you can, and you can start with video. In any case, there is just one great epic that tells the story in its proper form, the great poem of Camoes, a man born to piracy and high adventure. This man lost an eye in war in Ceuta against the Moor; he then lived as a brigand and vagabond in imperial Lisbon, getting into one duel and fight after another, composing poetry, getting drunk. His mother saved him from prison, but he was pressed into service in the colonial navy and army. He arrived in Goa and from there participated in many adventures, military and diplomatic, as a man of low rank but high spirits. All the while he was writing his great poem the Lusiad, and when he was shipwrecked off the Mekong with his Chinese girlfriend, he carried the text of this timeless work above his head to save it from the water. No one reads it anymore, and his life would make a great movie. But he is right that the voyages of these new crusaders equal any great expedition even from the myths and legends of the past.

Here we have Jason’s Argo made anew, and not just once, but in every one of these nations of the West. England’s glory during these years might never be equaled again by any people. Even the kings of Portugal, who started the age of colonization and exploration, had English blood. The Gothic restlessness of the steppe shook in the lords of Iberia with a Titanic energy. Before the great voyage to the Orient of Vasco da Gama, spies—and I miccionan just one or two men—went alone on expeditions in Egypt and down the Red Sea, into the heart of Arabia, antiestéticarlessly, incognito, to collect information crucial for the coming expedition. Perched on the beaches of the great Eurasian mass, these men went, in just a hundred years, from sailing a few almost-rafts that they barely knew how to navigate, to explorers of new worlds and founders of global empires that lasted for centuries. You must understand how amazing this antiestéticat was: there was no tradition of seamanship in Portugal or Spain, let alone France or England...it all had to be done from scratch. Do you know at all to respect the sea? If you’ve ever traveled a ferry on even a relatively calm sea like the Adriatic, on a windy day a large modern ferry, as big as a city block...it will swing right and left. You won’t be used to it. The Atlantic has waves ten feet or more as a matter of course and these men were traveling on wooden ships with 15th Century tech; you must be crazy to have no awe of this. For romance of the sea you should read Melville.

Columbus is celebrated, yes, but there were others who were even greater than him, or at least his equal, and few know about them. They don’t receive the glory they deserve because, first, many of the writers who could have done this were prejudiced against their strong religious faith and their piety: you see, most of the modern glorifiers of antiquity usually had an axe to grind against Christianity or the Church, so they didn’t want to promote these men, or admit that the champions of the faith were the most shining exemplars of the classical man in our time. Even Nietzsche stays away from them and, in a moment of weakness, speaks nonsense about the “superiority” of the Aztecs. On the other hand, the Church has been embarrassed about these men. More than anyone else they spread its power and gospel through the world, and even before that, they saved Europe itself from the Moors and the other threats. They’re the direct descendants of the crusaders who liberated Spain and other parts of Europe. The Church doesn’t want to admit that once Ferdinand and Isabella cleared Spain of the enemies of Christ, God blessed that nation with a century of prosperity and pre-eminence, and gave it the foundation of world-empire. But the Church was embarrassed by them, by the conquistadores, by their cruelty and their pagan love of vitality and action, so it tried to disavow them while making use of their strength. So their story remains largely untold, although it’s one of the peaks of history and of manly achievement.

Few understand the voyages, for example, of even one of the most famous among them, Vasco da Gama and how in many ways it exceeded the antiestéticats of Columbus. This man circumnavigated Africa and found the sea route to the Indies—what Columbus had actually set out to do (or so the story goes...I believe Columbus had some secret maps...) Such voyage was attempted long before by the Phoenician Hanno, but no one knows what really came of that. The travel was difficult. When you reach a certain point of the West African coast you can’t just continue to hug along it...you have to pull out to the west and swoop around—this is likely how South America was discovered. Do you know what starvation, scurvy, and tropical disease is? Do you understand tropical heat? Sure, some of you might, but know that off the West Africa coast, when a wind blows in your face it’s not a relief: it’s like a hairdryer going off in your face, nonstop. And yet he reached India, he found spices, he found monkey, he made the Zamorin submit with big guns. His investors made thousands of percent return. Just seven years later another conquistador returned, Almeida, with a great armada that tore a swathe of destruction along the Indian Ocean. He burned down Mombasa, though outnumbered, because of the arrogance of its Arab rulers—imagine the stench that must have wafted as far as Japan! This man defeated a huge armada of Ottomans, Arabs, Mamelukes at the Battle of Diu, to avenge the death of his son: and this was momentous time. Space itself on our world changed. The great overland routes of trade were now outflanked by the seafaring nations of western Europe, which from this moment began to dominate the Indian Ocean and the Pacific.

Do you understand America had a great destiny in this design as well? When the colonists founded Jamestown, let’s say there were no more than two hundred or two hundred and fifty years from that act to the time of Commodore Perry: the American people had tamed the continent and pushed their way to Asia across the seas in no time at all. It would have happened even faster if they hadn’t been hampered by the domination of England...once they gained their independence their expansion was very fast (the Constitution, the ideology, the doctrine of rights, is all so much nonsense and has nothing to do with any of this...it barely all even lasted through the lifetimes of the founders of America, who were seeking merely dominion and freedom of space to expand). The great destiny of America had always been the conquest of the Far East and the domination of China, which obsessed the leading minds of that time. All of this has now been forgotten and America’s great fate has been thwarted—at least for now. What do you know then of men like this, or of Afonso de Albuquerque who amowed Almeida, who captured Hormuz and Muscat with seven ships, who opened the way to the Spice Islands of legend?

I prefer as usual not to talk of such men: they are so far from your possibilities that the example is almost depressing. I want to encourage you again with someone else from this age, a man more to my taste, and more within the realm of what is possible, of what is about to become possible again. This is the brilliant right-hand-man of Cortes, Pedro de Alvarado. He was a man of knightly family from southern Spain, but had fiery red-blond hair, which amazed the Mexicas: they believed he was a child of the Sun, and called him Tonatiuh, the mane of the sun. He was of boundless courage, carelessness, and also boundless cruelty. Cortes left him in charge briefly in Tenochtitlan where he massacred all the Aztec nobles in the Great Temple during a banquet...for no reason at all. During the battles he distinguished himself by insane charges into the thick of the enemy by which he was outnumbered by hundreds to one: yet he never lost heart, he went right for their garish flower-decorated lieutenants and cut them down, striking antiestéticar into the multitude. Don’t believe the lies about gunpowder. Guns were very basic at this time, and on many occasions the Spanish didn’t have guns at all. The armor, the pikes, the Toledo steel blades, the discipline and know-how from decades of fighting the Moor—all of this was far more important. And above all, bravery and daring, the same that led Pizarro to take down an empire with a retinue of thirteen men. What I want to say about Alvarado, though, is this: once conquests were made, he never stopped. His thirst for space, for new worlds, for new conquests, was without end. In his letters you see this is his only interest. Though made governor of a huge area—the present-day states of Guatemala, of Honduras, these are his creations—he nevertheless showed no interest at all in ruling them. He squeezed them of whatever money he could, never paying any taxes back to Spain, and always planned new adventures and new conquests. This man was a born pirate: right before his death he was planning a great expedition for the conquest of China and the Spice Islands. Alvarado was a nemesis to civilization, and this is right and good. God sends such men to chastise mankind.

I want you to be like this: to listen to these instincts in you. When he was put in charge of territory, Alvarado could have very easily settled down to the life of a governor; most men would. Enticed by the prestige and honor, they would play the part: then also, their vanity would fool them into thinking that they could govern well. Well, maybe you can govern well, or maybe you can’t. But Alvarado knew what he was. And he didn’t try to be more than one thing. Be one thing. Single-minded purity of purpose is true manliness. He knew he was a born beast of prey, and never pretended to be more or less than this. This self-assured sense of who he was made him insanely attractive even to the natives he oppressed and massacred: despite his cruelty, they couldn’t help being drawn to his charm, his lofty manner, his outrageous magnificence. They worshiped him as a god. The other Spaniards were in awe as well. You must see that nature blesses all men who have faith in their own blood and in their instincts...nature blesses them with such magnetism. Alvarado is the avatar of our new age, and I predict this: within fifty years a hundred Alvarados will bloom from deep in the tropical bestiary of the spirit. They will sweep away the weakness of this world.



BAP habla en este parágrafo de los conquistadores españoles y de los exploradores portugueses (y desliza algún nombre inglés que yo no transcribiré)

Cruzados como Cortés y Pizarro, Fernando de Soto, Magallanes y Balboa, igualan en atrevimiento, inteligencia, grandeza de espíritu, inventiva y logros a cualquier gran hombre de los antiguos Griegos y Romanos

Por ejemplo, Camoes, un hombre nacido para la piratería y la aventura: perdió un ojo en Ceuta, en guerra contra el jovenlandés; luego vivió como bandido y vagabundo en la Lisboa imperial, de duelo en duelo, escribiendo poesía, y emborrachándose. Su madre lo sacó de prisión, pero fue enrolado a la fuerza al servicio de la armada colonial. Llegó a Goa, donde vivió muchas aventuras, y mientras tanto escribía su gran poema "As Luisiadas" y cuando naufragó en el Mekong en compañía de su novia china, salvó su obra llevándola sobre su cabeza mientras estaba en el agua

Había sangre inglesa en los portugueses, y gótica en la de los españoles. Pensad lo que era viajar por el Océano con la tecnología del siglo XV: una hazaña increíble. Debéis leer a Melville


Colón es festejado, sí, pero hubo otros que fueron más grandes que él, o al menos sus iguales, y pocos los conocen. No reciben la gloria que merecen por su relación con la Iglesia, en un doble sentido: uno, los historiadores actuales, agnósticos y ateos, no quieren promover hombres que fueron campeones de la fe católica; dos, la propia Iglesia se avergüenza de estos hombres, que difundieron el Evangelio y salvaron a Europa de los jovenlandeses y de otras amenazas, por su crueldad, y su pagano amor hacia la vitalidad y la acción (Nota de Gurney: antes de todo esto está la Leyenda Negra de toda la vida)

BAP habla ahora de Vasco da Gama: circunnavegó África y encontró la ruta marítima hacia las Indias. Una vez allí, encontró especias, monos, y sometió a los Zamorin (Nota de Gurney: unos indios de la India, también conocidos como Samoothiri). Sus patrocinadores consiguieron un retorno de beneficios absolutamente fabuloso

Y luego está Almeida, que con una gran armada esparció la destrucción a lo largo del Océano Índico. Quemó Mombasa por la arrogancia de los árabes que la regían, y derrotó a una enorme armada de otomanos, árabes y mamelucos en la Batalla de Diu, para vengar la muerte de su hijo

Todo esto cambió el mismo espacio de nuestro mundo, y las grandes rutas de comercio por tierra fueron entonces flanqueadas por las naciones marineras de Europa occidental, que desde ese momento comenzaron a dominar el Índico y el Pacífico


Entendéis que América tuvo también un gran destino en este proyecto? Desde la fundación de Jamestown, en poco menos de 250 años el Comodoro Perry llegó a Japón y rompió su aislamiento. Todo habría sido aún más rápido sin la dominación de Inglaterra. El gran destino de America siempre ha sido la conquista de Extremo Oriente y la dominación de China, y eso era algo que obsesionaba a las grandes mentes de aquella época. Todo eso se ha olvidado, y ese gran sino ha sido frustrado -al menos por ahora


BAP prefiere, como hace habitualmente, no hablar de tales hombres (Nota de Gurney: jajaja, claro, pero ya ha deslizado su pequeña gota de veneno del bueno). Quiere motivarnos con un hombre de aquel tiempo, pero más de su gusto y más dentro del reino de lo que es posible: Pedro de Alvarado. Mano derecha de Cortés, de familia de caballeros del sur de España, pelirrojo que fascinó a los Mexicas, que creían que era el hijo del Sol, y lo llamaron Tonatiuh, que significa "La melena del Sol". No tenía límites en su coraje, arrojo y también crueldad. Por ejemplo, sin motivo masacró a los nobles de Tenochtitlán durante un banquete. Durante los combates se distinguió por sus locas cargas contra el grueso del enemigo. Y no creáis las mentiras sobre la ventaja tecnológica de la pólvora, porque en aquel tiempo las armas de fuego eran muy básicas. Fueron las armaduras, las picas, las hojas de acero de Toledo, la disciplina, el saber hacer de décadas (siglos en realidad) de lucha contra el jovenlandés. Y por encima de todo, el valor y al atrevimiento, lo mismo que llevó a Pizarro a someter a un imperio con un séquito de 13 hombres

Alvarado nunca paró. Su sed de espacio, de nuevos mundos y conquistas no tenía fin. No servía para gobernador, sino que era un pirata de nacimiento: justo antes de su muerte estaba planeando una expedición para la conquista de China y las Islas de las Especias (=las Molucas)

Alvarado fue una némesis de la civilización, y esto es bueno y correcto: Dios manda a hombres así para castigar y enseñar a la humanidad

BAP os exhorta: Quiero que seáis así, que escuchéis esos instintos dentro de vosotros. Sed una sola cosa: la pureza de la mente que tiene un sólo propósito es la verdadera hombría

Alvarado es el avatar de nuestra nueva edad, y BAP predice que dentro de 50 años, un centenar de Alvarados florecerán en el bestiario tropical del espíritu. Ellos barrerán la debilidad de este mundo

 

[Gurney]

 

[Gurney]

 

[Gurney]

62
Bob Denard shows that the spirit of Bronze Age pirate can exist also in our age. It can flower complete and unedited. You have no excuse! This man may not be what you expect. How different he is from the pretentious bureaucrats we see, the politicians with their high-flown language, their tedious moral preaching, their careful self-positioning, timidity, and the drudgery to which they subject themselves. Men who embrace high-flown moral principle in public are usually looked down on by many regular people; they can smell the bullshit from far away. He started out as a regular soldier with the French in Vietnam, but he was court-martialed after he burned down a bar—part of a dispute, you see. Some men chimp out by writing a complaint, others by getting in a bar fight, others by burning down the building. After this he wandered around Africa, finding odd jobs in the employ of local nabobs and potentates, all of them utterly corrupt and incompetent. He said once something like, “It’s important never to be ‘ambitious.’ Men of ‘ambition’ are losers. Act and feel like a winner and good things, friends, and victory will come.” He took part in adventures all over Africa: coups in Benin, the Congo, secessionist movements like in Biafra (the French styling on English Nigeria) and so forth. His greatest antiestéticat was to overthrow the government of the Comoros four times. Each time France had to send special forces to the islands to dislodge him. Otherwise he would have surely become a hereditary ruler. He had many wives and won many properties by the power of his hand. At the end of his life...well...this life lasted too long. He should have died in defense of his territory, younger, and without descending into the dementia and pain that took him in old age. France repaid his service with persecution; no longer needed to fight communists in Africa, his vainglory and ferocity became a liability. Now, if you need great moral elevation, if war must be in the service of a good cause, you can consider his service in Congo, in Katanga and then against the Simba rebels. At Stanleyville he, along with only a handful of other white mercenaries, freed thousands of hostages from rape and sure massacre at the hands of the savage Simbas. In many ways he defended whatever residues of civilization remained in Africa after decolonization. In this last venture he was joined by a man of similar temperament, the Colonel “Mad Mike” Hoare.

This is another great example of the modern rebirth of Bronze Age vitalism. And another example of why you’re a fag. An Irish-English dandy, he was a gentleman among soldiers, but a man before being a gentleman: he remained throughout his life single-minded, brutal and cool-headed in the middle of conflicts where he was outnumbered thousands to one, swamped by the demented zombi hordes of the tropics. This man understood communism for what it was: the infestation of vermin he was tasked to exterminate, a biological event, not an ideological, political, or historical one. After the war in Burma he made a living working on safaris and then, like Denard, gaining experience in the service of various African governments. He led an elite unit of mercs in the Congo, and in the same operation with Denard, was responsible for relieving Stanleyville and saving a hundred nuns and missionaries from rape and torture. Thereafter he led many missions in Africa, a new frontier. He was later involved in an aborted coup on the Seychelles.

Failure is not dishonorable, as long as you are making a great gamble for great gains. It isn’t right to judge such people by the “justice” of their cause. Some of you spergs and almost all of the half- educated class think when Nietzsche talks about “beyond good and evil” that he’s making some grand proposition about there being no possibility to evaluate men or events. Morality is absolute necessity for the people. There is the other morality, that reveals a biological hierarchy. Just the same, a different standard applies to huemans, and a different one to the true men who are willing to live in danger, and who don’t care for their animal lives. Men like Denard and Hoare are a great attempt on the part of nature itself: they show that even in our age there are men who yearn inscribe their wills in bronze for the ages, who want their terrible creations to endure for centuries. They should be judged by what they were willing to risk in their spirit—and also by the unequaled rush they all must have had, inside them, as they pursued their high aims.

Even just a few years ago Margaret Thatcher’s son Mark was given a sentence in South Africa in 2005 for an attempted coup in Equatorial Guinea. He was ratted out and caught at the airport. You must understand that the meddlesome little cretinoids who run the West always put a stop to great plans and great actions. They’ve ended many promising adventures through their snooping...they’re tattletales, always watching, never sleeping, always whispering. Gallant men, who live under the sign of the lion are stopped before they can act. A different way is necessary. But I miccionan to say, don’t be fooled: in our age too men of adamantine character exist, who fight like Capaneus before Thebes, ready nude with fire in arm to burn down city. They appear now as villain, now as hero to the people, but you must learn to forget just this desire of the people and yearn rather to live dangerously and do great deeds, for good or evil. The danger of our time is not that it makes people bad, but that it makes everything small and afraid.

Neall Ellis in his trusty Mi-24 Hind helicopter held off the rebels in the Sierra Leone civil war, singlehandedly, and saved innumerable lives. There’s little glamor in his job, and in the end it didn’t matter: but on his trusty flying Hind steed he must have felt like a beast of prey swooping down on the enemy. He worked for company, Executive Outcomes—a name that might make you think of second- rate consulting company in office park. But this was merc company that ended the civil war in Sierra Leone and threatened to establish a new order all over Africa. For this reason they were stopped by the UN, by gangs of international lawyers and financiers who antiestéticar the power of the new Sea Peoples. How long can they hold off such men from their destiny? In the Rhodesian war, you had companies of a few white farmers, raised in the bush, who ambushed armies of Zambia and Mozambique many thousands strong. They would attack with stealth, stalking them, inflict frightful casualties, and escape unharmed. Many such stories: look up Nyadzonya raid.

The potential for adventures and conquests like European man has rarely experienced in the past still exists, and I have no doubt that in the coming years such opportunities will become ever more frequent. The great Leviathan will falter, sooner or later. The coming age of barbarism will not be owned, as so many of you urban cucks antiestéticar, by the gangbangers and the unwashed hordes of the teeming cesspools of the world, but by clean-cut middle-class and working-class vets, men of military experience, who know something about how to shoot and how to organize. The fools who think oligarchs will be able to control these men for very long should look to the fortunes of the Sforzas and many others, and remember that money is no match for force of arms combined with charm.

When Theodore Roosevelt was I think close to seventy years old, he went on expedition to the Amazon, then mostly still unexplored: he called it one last chance to be a boy. This expedition led to his death; and it was a good death. He amowed in footsteps of men of power like Lope de Aguirre...and never lost the yearning in his heart for Eldorado.



Bob Denard muestra que el espíritu del pirata de la Edad del Bronce puede existir también en nuestra época. No tienes excusas!
Empezó como soldado regular con Francia en Vietnam, pero tuvo un consejo de guerra por quemar un bar en un altercado. Después vagabundeó por África, encontrando extraños trabajos para potentados locales, corruptos e incompetentes. Una vez dijo: "Es importante no ser nunca "ambicioso". Los hombres de ambición son perdedores. Debes actuar y sentirte como un ganador, y cosas buenas, amigos y victorias vendrán". Corrió aventuras por toda África: golpes en Benin, en el Congo; movimientos secesionistas en Biafra. Su gran hazaña fue derrocar 4 veces el gobierno de las Comoros, y en cada ocasión Francia tuvo que enviar a sus Fuerzas Especiales, porque de lo contrario se habría convertido en señor de las islas. Tuvo muchas esposas, y ganó muchas propiedades por el poder de su mano. Su final no fue bueno: su vida duró demasiado, y cayó en la demencia y el dolor. Debería haber muerto antes, en defensa de su territorio, más joven

Otro ejemplo es el Coronel "Mad Mike" Hoare. Y otro ejemplo de porqué eres lgtb
Un Anglo-irlandés dandy, un caballero entre soldados, pero un hombre antes que un caballero: permaneció siempre concentrado, brutal y con sangre fría en mitad de conflictos en los que era sobrepasado por mil a uno, inundado por hordas dementes de zombis de los trópicos. Entendió el comunismo como lo que es: un plaga de gusanos que él estaba encargado de exterminar: un evento biológico, no ideológico o político o histórico. Después de la guerra en Birmania (Myanmar), se ganó la vida haciendo safaris y luego, como Denard, ganó experiencia al servicio de diversos gobiernos jovenlandeses. Lideró una unidad de élite de mercenarios en el Congo: protegió Stanleyville y salvó de la violación y tortura a cientos de monjas y misioneros. Después llevó a cabo diversas misiones y aventuras en África, y participó en un golpe frustrado en las Seychelles

Y el fallo no es deshonroso, mientras te reporte ganancias. No es correcto juzgar a tales hombres por la justicia de su causa, como dice Nietzsche en "Más allá del bien y del mal". La moralidad es necesaria para el pueblo. Pero hay otra moralidad que revela una jerarquía biológica: es un standard diferente entre huemans (Nota de Gurney: una palabra con muchos matices, difícil de traducir) y los hombres verdaderos que quieren vivir en el peligro y que no se preocupan por su propia vida animal. De modo que serán juzgados por aquello que deseaban arriesgar en su espíritu, y por el ardor sin igual que llevaban dentro en la persecución de esos grandes fines

Incluso hace unos años, Mark, el hijo de Margaret Thatcher fue condenado en Sudáfrica por un intento de golpe de Estado en Guinea Ecuatorial. Debéis entender que los pequeños cretinos entrometidos que gobiernan Occidente siempre obstaculizan los grandes planes y las grandes acciones. Es necesario un camino diferente. Pero que no os engañen: en nuestra edad también existen hombres de carácter de adamantium, que luchan como Capaneo delante de las murallas de Tebas, desnudo, con una antorcha en su mano para quemar la ciudad (Nota de Gurney: y blasfemando contra Zeus, que lo exterminó con un rayo)
Son considerados héroes o villanos, pero da igual, porque lo único que importa es vivir peligrosamente y hacer grandes obras, para bien o para mal. El peligro de nuestro tiempo no es que la gente sea mala, sino que sea pequeña y temerosa

Otros ejemplos son Neall Ellis con su helicóptero Mi-24 Hind; y también la Guerra de Rodesia

El potencial para la aventura y la conquista aún existe: y en los años venideros tales oportunidades serán aún más frecuentes. El gran Levitan caerá, tarde o temprano. La edad del barbarismo no será dominada por bandas tercermundistas, sino por veteranos de clase media y trabajadora, hombres con experiencia militar, que saben algo sobre cómo disparar y cómo organizarse. Los que crean que los oligarcas podrán controlar a hombres así...que lean sobre los Sforza y que recuerden que el dinero no es rival para la combinación de las armas y el encanto personal

Theodore Roosevelt, cuando estaba cerca de los 70 años, se fue de expedición al Amazonas. Siguiendo los paso de hombres de poder como Lope de Aguirre, sin perder nunca el ansia en su corazón por encontrar Eldorado...y aunque la aventura le costara la muerte, él lo consideraba su última oportunidad para volver a ser joven

 

[Gurney]

Part Four: a Few Arrows

63
Giving “freedom” to women—an impossibility. With the liberation of women in the 19th century, the West has given itself an infection from which it can’t recover without the most terrible convulsions and the most thorough purgative measures.

What the “freedom” of women means in practice is the domination of mankind by the demagogues who can rally the lower orders of the spirit. Because there is no world in which “the women” can act as a political unit. Liberation of women means freedom and power for financiers, lawyers, purveyors of comforts in and outside government, employers who whore out your wife and daughters. It has been the greatest weakening and self-own a civilization has ever visited on itself. But in the end is this so different from democracy as such? Yes...because the “liberation” of women makes democracy into a terminal disease...one that doesn’t just end a particular government, but the civilization.


Empezamos la Cuarta Parte: Unas pocas flechas


Dar "libertad" a las mujeres es una imposibilidad. Con la liberación de la mujer en el siglo XIX, Occidente se ha provocado a sí mismo una infección de la que no se podrá recuperar sin las más terribles convulsiones y las purgaciones más exhaustivas

Lo que la "libertad" de las mujeres significa en la práctica es el dominio de la humanidad por parte de los demagogos que sean capaces de desatar los niveles más bajos del espíritu. Porque no hay mundo en el que las mujeres puedan actuar como unidad política. La liberación de las mujeres implica libertad y poder para los financieros, abogados, proveedores de confort dentro y fuera del gobierno, empleados que prostituirán a tu mujer y a tus hijas. Ha sido la mayor derrota autoinflingida que una civilización haya tenido alguna vez. Pero es en última instancia diferente de lo que es la democracia? Sí...porque la "liberación" de la mujer convierte a la democracia en una enfermedad terminal...una que no termina simplemente con un gobierno en particular, sino con la civilización

 

[Wintermute006]

 

[Gurney]

Tremendo hilo

 

[Gurney]

64
If you wonder how mankind fell from the high times of the Renaissance and the age of exploration to our times of mediocrity and repression...I can only tell you this, that our age is the norm in history. It takes great efforts and much good luck to be able to surpass the dirty ape and rat inside us all. Most of mankind never left the regime of deformity, and it’s no surprise that this morass is returning. It’s just a reversion to the norm.
That said, there does seem to be something especially menacing about developments in our age: the ubiquity of this Leviathan, the inability to escape it. Everywhere you might become a hermit, you are reminded of it, it intrudes everywhere. And so the very success of the great men of four hundred years ago, their foundation of a new world, the great expansion of human knowledge and know-how...this ended up setting the stage for our trash-world. They succeeded beyond what they could expect, and that success is what allowed the profusion of the lower types of mankind.

In nature the vital part of mankind would rule and in the beginnings of many societies it does: military brotherhoods of men rule, and physical force as well as force of personality, charisma, draw the rest in an orbit around those who possess these in the highest degree. This is all by a natural and secret pull, by instinct. There is a magic to charisma that does this, and the military- monarchical organization, the rule of the warlord, comes from desire for this in the nature of all, not from reflection and abstraction. Unfortunately some things conspire to end this original condition of mankind, which is itself no paradise and is full of strife, suffering and problems. These things are, first of all, the very success of these men in securing the conditions of life and comfort for the rest of the community. Second, the ascent, within this peacetime, of the priest, the shaman, the schemer, and the matriarch, which slowly usurp power away from the brotherhoods of young men and their captains. Spinoza explains the corruption of the Jewish people in just this way: the Hebrew “Republic” was in fact a military regime of the type I say here, a rule of the captains. But the priests took this power away and corrupted the nation to weakness. In same way something happened to the Aryans in India and in many other places. This state of things doesn’t need to be so: the men of religion and those of power have many interests in common, and can rule together. But it often happens that the men of power become decadent and let the state drift into the hands of those who can’t rule—and who start to resent them for this abdication. Women become also very aggressive, once real and relaxed manhood atrophies. If you imagine that women in the Muslim world, for example, are sweet and feminine...they are hungry viragos of iron will. The feminist Muslima will be a figure of much importance among them. The men in Arabia will turn lgtb. The Vietnamese or Chinese grandmother has her knee on the neck of the son-in-law.

Thus everywhere we see that the very comforts and safety produced by the best men leads to the usurpation of society by those parts of the human spirit that are oriented instead toward a different kind of life, that everywhere that mode of the yeast wins out...and usually wins out very quickly. And in the West, whose special fate has been confused for History or Progress of the entire species, this development has taken place through the promotion of logos or reason and all the manifestations of this: the adulation of empty words, of legalism as a guide for social and political life, of the cult of science that is very far from real science.

All of this has been a cover for the ascent of the blob human, of the lower orders of the spirit and is instead delivering not just the West, but all of mankind, to a condition of domestic brokenness and servility. Very concretely you see in feminism the return of pre-Aryan matriarchy. The great “Earth Mother,” originally some kind of half-hueman half-cockroach creature resplendent with horrid eggs like big Amazon centipede....this seeks to re- absorb you. Of all the things that you blame for the decrepit times we live in, feminism and the “liberation” of women is both the proximate and the ultimate cause. Nothing so ridiculous as the liberation of women has ever been attempted in the history of mankind. It is an act of complete insanity, disguised as “logic,” “reason,” presented in the most absurd legalisms about supposed “rights.” The modern socialisms, the expansion of the power of the state that squashes all initiative and all life, the hypocrisy of all political life in our time—all of this is to be attributed to the participation of women in political life. I don’t complain about the “freedom” or “degeneracy” that supposedly comes from this arrangement. That’s all misdirection and self-flattery. The state we live in is as repressive as any oriental tyranny. But its hypocrisy is that it hides its force under the delusion of egalitarian ideals and legalistic procedures inconsistently applied. It is not women actually being free, but their “legal freedom,” a practical fiction, being used by a hidden power to oppress, to dispossess, to intimidate and extort. It took one hundred years of women in public life for them to almost totally destroy a civilization.

But you would be a sperg to think that this problem can be solved by taking away women’s voting power, “forcing” them into the home, or some such thing. The presence of women in public life is a spear with two tips, and can be turned on the enemy with some ease. Women, after all, can still, even in the most debased condition, be made to call on their deep passions by a great leader. They voted for Hitler, Mussolini, and many others, with some enthusiasm. The enemy who “freed” them has made use of a great weapon: he has increased his power immensely and introduced a war into the house and life of every man. But this enemy also made a gamble and I believe, ultimately, a mistake...because women more than others will set their bodies on fire with passion for a savior and be willing to abandon the antiestéticar and love of comfort on which the modern state depends...them more than others, out of a wild and stupid enthusiasm.




Si te preguntas como cayó la humanidad desde la alturas del Renacimiento y la Época de la Exploración hasta nuestros tiempos de mediocridad y represión...BAP sólo puede decir esto: nuestra época es la norma en la historia. Hacen falta grandes esfuerzos y mucha buena suerte para superar al mono y a la rata que llevamos dentro
No obstante, parece haber algo especialmente amenazante en el desarrollo de nuestro tiempo: la ubicuidad del Levitan, la imposibilidad de escapar de él. Además (Nota de Gurney: Esto se desarrolla en el siguiente párrafo) el enorme éxito de los hombres de hace 4 siglos preparó el escenario para nuestro mundo de hez

En el estado natural, la parte vital de la humanidad domina, y en el principio de muchas sociedades es igual: hermandades militares de hombres mandan, y la fuerza física, como también la personalidad potente y el carisma, ponen en órbita los demás en torno suya, por instinto, como un tirón natural y secreto, y no por la reflexión o la abstracción. Desafortunadamente, algunas cosas conspiran para terminar con esta condición original de la humanidad, que en si misma no es un paraíso, sino que está llena de lucha, sufrimiento y problemas. Estas cosas son, en primer lugar, el propio éxito de esos hombres en asegurar las condiciones de vida y el bienestar para el resto de la sociedad; y en segundo, el ascenso en ese tiempo de paz del sacerdote, del chamán, del intrigante y de la matriarca. Eso dice Spinoza sobre la corrupción del pueblo judío; y esquemas similares se observan en los Arios de la India, en el mundo de la religión del amor o en la fruta vieja china o vietnamita que aplasta con su rodilla el cuello de su yerno
No tendría porqué ser así, porque los hombres de religión y los hombres de poder tienen muchos intereses en común, y podrían regir conjuntamente. Pero con frecuencia sucede que los hombres de poder se convierten en decadentes, y dejan que el estado sea dominado por las manos de aquellos que no pueden mandar, y que comienzan a culparles por esta abdicación. Las mujeres también se vuelven muy agresivas, una vez que la hombría real y relajada se atrofia

Y en Occidente, donde este destino particular ha sido confundido con la Historia, o el Progreso, de toda la especie, ha tenido lugar a través de la promoción del logos o de la razón y de todas sus manifestaciones: la adulación de las palabras vacías, el legalista como guía para la vida social y política, y el culto de la ciencia -que está muy lejos de la ciencia real

Todo esto ha sido una máscara para encubrir el ascenso del hombre-masa, de los órdenes inferiores del espíritu, y no sólo en Occidente, sino para toda la humanidad: una condición de rotura y servidumbre. Muy concretamente en el feminismo puedes ver el retorno al matriarcado pre-Ario: la gran "Madre Tierra", originalmente una especie de criatura resplandeciente, medio-humana y medio-cucaracha, con horrendos bemoles como un gran ciempiés del Amazonas...y que quiere reabsorberte

El socialismo, la expansión del poder del Estado que aplasta toda iniciativa y toda vida, y la hipocresía de la vida política de nuestro tiempo, se deben a la participación de la mujer en la vida política

Y en realidad las mujeres no son libres, sino que tienen "libertad legal", una ficción práctica, usada por un poder oculto para oprimir, desposeer, intimidar y extorsionar. Les ha llevado 100 años de vida pública de las mujeres para casi destruir totalmente una civilización

Pero serías un puñetero Asperger si pensaras que este problema podría resolverse arrebatando a las mujeres el derecho a votar, "recluyéndolas" en casa, o cosas así. Porque la presencia de las mujeres en la vida pública es una lanza de 2 puntas, y pueden ser vueltas contra el enemigo con cierta facilidad. Las mujeres, después de todo, incluso en su condición más degradada, pueden ser despertadas en sus pasiones más profundas por un gran líder. Votaron por Hitler y Mussolini, y muchos otros, con algo de entusiasmo

BAP ve que las mujeres llenarán sus cuerpos de fuego con pasión por un salvador, y estarán dispuestas a abandonar el miedo y el amor al bienestar del que el moderno estado depende...ellas más que ningunos otros, presas de un salvaje y menso entusiasmo

 

[Gurney]

65
How was it possible for women to become “free” at some point in the 19th century...how did this agitation come about? From where comes the gynocracy that rules, not just as in tribal societies covertly, but that now pretends also to be in the public sphere and to demand “rights”? Who was there in the first place to give rights...and of what use is a right if it’s not also a privilege? The answer to all this is a little bit more unpleasant. It’s only because women lost all respect for the males of the time that there could be any pretext like feminism or “women’s suffrage” in the first place. The loss of respect in general marks the modern age since 1800 or so: the loss of respect in authority, for example, that came when industrialists and bankers replaced the warrior nobility. As “decadent” as the latter had become, this class had never really lost its grace of manner, its beauty and magnificence and glamor: this made the common man more eager to submit, or to accept such leadership. But who could accept the rule of the dour economic creature that took the lead in the states at the end of the 18th century?

This is why Napoleon was such an enigma for so many: he represented a man out of time, something completely unexpected in the age of middle class mediocrity and hypocritical “democracy” that was just then coming about. For this reason all the higher spirits of the 19th century, all the great artists, the writers, they threw themselves at the feet of his memory: he seemed to represent the possibility of higher aspirations in our time. You can read Stendhal for this spirit. Napoleon was an escape from the domination of the bugman that was just then beginning to take hold of the nations.

Now, don’t imagine I will attack “the bourgeois” ... we’ve declined so far even from the level of the bourgeois of that age...in our time the desolation is almost complete. This is why it’s so ridiculous to hear these “conservatives” yap on about honor, or glory, or sacrifice, or any of this garbage. The respect in all institutions and all leadership classes and all traditional authority has already been lost long ago, and for good reason. It’s impossible for the erased males to command any respect from the people...and still less from their women. Feminism then is the revolt of women against the outrage of democracy. They have been in a revolt against the inability of the bugman to command authority or respect.

And you must understand that there is no bottom to this “freedom” or revolution. There won’t be any opportunity to say “I told you so”: they will never “learn a lesson” from their foolishness. And they resent the insecurity you have put them in. The calamity that will surely amow from going down this path will not be a “teachable moment” to anyone. They resent the “beta”, but you’re wrong to think it was ever any different. No... great civilizations and cultures were never founded nor kept alive by “betas”. The nerdoids who have taken over much of the right have brainwashed you to this view, but it’s wrong. Women never loved the shopkeeper, the timid merchant with the nasal voice, and no, not even the clockmaker or craftsman. They have always loved the knight, the sailor in love with wild ideas of the sea, the adventurer and pirate. And it is right that they loved these men, and that, with the coming of the rule of the bugman, they would try to seek their “liberation” from unworthy men and the boring society they were building. That this resentment was manipulated itself by the Satanic power that rules our time, and that through this very drive for freedom woman became enslaved more than she had been before...is beside the point. You won’t be able to make women “see reason” and love a “beta civilization”—a fabrication of the HBD cuckold crowd of our time. Women will love you if you are a warrior.

And they will help, through the entirely retarded mechanism of democracy, to elect men of glamor and charisma who are our only immediate hope against the machine that runs our garbage world. Trump, for all his hesitations, is only the beginning. He has shown the path insofar as woman is concerned. The mob also is a woman.
Now imagine a man of Trump’s charisma, but who is not merely beholden to the generals, but one of them, and able to rule and intimidate them as well as seduce the many. So far we have only had Gracchi ...but Caesars and Napoleons are sure to amow.



Cómo fue posible para las mujeres el convertirse en "libres" en cierto punto del siglo XIX...cómo vino esta agitación?
Sólo porque las mujeres perdieron todo el respeto por los hombres de su tiempo. Esa pérdida de respeto en general marca la Edad Moderna desde aproximadamente el año 1800, y que vino cuando los industriales y los banqueros reemplazaron a la nobleza guerrera

Por eso Napoleón es un enigma: un hombre fuera de su tiempo, algo completamente inesperado en la época de la mediocridad de la clase media y de la hipócrita democracia que estaba a punto de llegar. Y por eso los espíritus elevados del 19, todos los artistas, escritores...se postraron ante su recuerdo. Porque representaba la posibilidad de grandes aspiraciones en nuestro tiempo; era una fuga frente a la dominación del bugman que empezaba por entonces a apoderarse de las naciones

No imagines que BAP vaya a atacar al "burgués", porque hemos descendido mucho más allá del nivel del burgués de aquella época. En nuestro tiempo, la desolación es casi completa. Por eso es ridículo oír los ladridos de esos "conservadores" sobre el honor, la gloria, el sacrificio o cualquiera de esas hezs. El respeto en todas las instituciones y en las clases dominantes y en toda autoridad tradicional se ha perdido hace mucho, y por una buena razón. Es imposible para hombres anulados exigir respeto de la gente...y mucho menos de sus mujeres. El feminismo sería entonces la revuelta de las mujeres contra la atroz democracia, contra la incapacidad del bugman de detentar autoridad o respeto

Y debes entender que no hay fondo para esta "libertad" o revolución, que no habrá ninguna oportunidad de decir "Te lo dije". Porque nunca aprenderán la lección sobre su propia poca falta de cultura. Y te culparán por la inseguridad que les has generado
Las grandes civilizaciones nunca fueron fundadas o mantenidas vivas por los "betas". Los nerds que han tomado el poder te han lavado el cerebro con esa idea, pero está equivocada. Las mujeres nunca amaron al tendero, o al mercachifle tímido de voz nasal...siempre han amado al caballero andante, al marinero enamorado de ideas salvajes sobre el mar, al aventurero y al pirata. Y es bueno que amaran a esta clase de hombres, y que con el advenimiento del bugman, traten de buscar una "liberación" de hombres indignos y de la sociedad aburrida que han construido. Y ese resentimiento ha sido manipulado por el poder satánico que domina nuestro tiempo, y a través de ese impulso la mujer será esclavizada más de lo que lo ha sido nunca. Nunca podrás lograr que las mujeres "vean la razón" y amen a una "civilización beta". Las mujeres sólo te amarán si eres un guerrero

Y ayudarán, a través del retarded mecanismo de la democracia, para elegir a hombres de glamour y carisma. Trump, a pesar de todas sus dudas, es sólo el principio. Él ha enseñado el camino. La masa es también una mujer. Ahora imagina a un hombre con el carisma de Trump, pero que no está simplemente sostenido por sus generales, sino que es uno de ellos, y que es capaz de mandar y de intimidarlos, y del mismo modo seducir a la mayoría

Hasta ahora sólo hemos tenidos a los Gracos...pero los Césares y los Napoleones sin duda llegarán

 

[Gurney]

 

[Gurney]

66
A man of great charisma who can seduce the people with a wild spirit and break through the rule of the pervasive bureaucracy-media complex is our best hope for the immediate problem...and maybe our only hope. Such a man might be among you and, in any case, he will need help. Our enemy has so much spread: he is everywhere. He’s in your home even, and he’s inside you. The domain of the fight has extended everywhere now.
Therefore any answer must be on multiple fronts, and each one calls for a different strategy and different type of talent and man. I antiestéticar that many of you are actually autists and spergs and don’t want to see this. There is no one fight and no one solution, and what you want in the end or as ideal may require different plan than facing imminent threat.
For the latter you can make alliance with people who otherwise wouldn’t be your friends. I believe that democracy is the final cause of all the political problems I describe here, but in the short run democracy—the will of the people —is on our side because the democracies have been hijacked by a stupid and corrupt elite. The nations face extinction and an era of permanent civil war because this elite wants to pillage and pillage: and wants to flood them with the shit of the world. This is the immediate threat, and on this you can be allied with people who otherwise may not shoot for the same star you do. If Ann Coulter or Pat Buchanan were in charge, you would get 99% of what you want. Therefore use them as models to solve the problems that face you, and don’t scare the peoples with crazy talk if you want to move things politically. Let the normies have their normal lives, and paint our enemies as the crazies...which they are... and as the corrupt vermin they are. If you haven’t compromised yourself go into political life maybe, and use Trump as a model for success. Those of you who choose this path, if you like this book or the other things I say, should denounce it and disavow me if ever asked about it, and denounce also all other crazy ideas. You must have an instinct for how much normies are able to take. It isn’t even a question of getting them to where you want “gradually”—I don’t think they’re able to get very far at all. But they can be moved to defend themselves from the grip of the global slave state, which I also hate, although for different reasons.

If an ethnostate is your ideal, or if it’s Renaissance Switzerland or ancient Egypt— fine. If you intend to go public and try something politically, work now instead so that America and Europe don’t become Bosnia or South Africa. People who try to mislead you from such things and try to encourage you to talk in public instead about abstractions like “ethnostate,” dork ideological constructs like “Eurasianism,” anachronistic slogans like “blood and soil” that never had any historical attraction to Anglos and Americans...these people are spergs or very often federal informants, or manipulated by such. By all means study such things, believe in them, troll with them, let them guide your final aims; but know what is possible in the normie political sphere and don’t become the clown of ZOG like Nehlen and so many others did. If they were serious people they would have never come in public and encouraged young men to go on marches where they could be identified and tracked for life. Know when the snake is defending itself—don’t be a patsy.
Your models must be those that have worked: Trump, Orban, the Italian movements now ascendant, Sebastian Kurz and his party in Austria. You don’t see these people marching around in hotel bellboy’s uniforms with a Sonnenrad and talking about the “Jewish Question” and this other kind of role-play.

It’s true that in the end, my aims here and those of someone like Orban have little or nothing in common. If they were successful, all they would be able to do is reestablish the same world of sheep that existed a hundred years ago, maybe inoculated against the latest degradations...but nothing very great. Still, I think it’s better for the nations to be well-tended, happy sheep than to be reduced to teeming piles of starving rats.

This, anyway, is my advice for those who want to go into normie politics and have a relatively normie life, and there’s nothing wrong with that—it’s even a great necessity.

I’ve written this book, however, because this may not satisfy some of us, and I wanted to talk about the world in the coming decades, and what paths may open for a different way.




Un hombre de gran carisma, que pueda seducir al pueblo con un espíritu salvaje y quebrar el dominio de la burocracia ubicua y de los medios de comunicación, es nuestra mayor esperanza para el problema inmediato...y tal vez sea la única
Un hombre así podría estar entre vosotros, y en cualquier caso, necesitará ayuda. El enemigo se ha extendido mucho: está en todas partes. Está en tu casa, y dentro de ti
Por ello, cualquier respuesta debe hacerse en múltiples frentes, y cada uno requiere una estrategia diferente, y un diferente tipo de talentos y de hombres. Muchos de vosotros sois autistas y obsesos y no lo veis: no hay una sola lucha, ni tampoco una sola solución. Y lo que tú quieres como conclusión o como ideal puede requerir un plan distinto al que requiere el enfrentarse a la amenaza inmediata
Para ello, puedes buscar alianzas con gente que en otra situación no serían tus amigos. BAP cree que la democracia es la causa de todos los problemas políticos que describe en su libro, pero que a corto plazo la democracia está de nuestra parte, porque ha sido secuestrada por una élite estulta y corrupta. Las naciones se enfrentan a la extinción y a una era de guerra civil permanente porque esa élite quiere saquear y saquear, y además quiere inundarlas con la hez del mundo. Ésta es la amenaza inmediata, y por eso la alianza con gente como Ann Coulter o Pat Buchanan es buena. En cualquier caso, como idea fundamental: debéis tener instinto para ver hasta dónde pueden llegar los normies. No es una cuestión de conducirlos gradualmente, porque no pueden llegar muy lejos. Pero sí pueden ser movilizados para defenderse a sí mismos de la garra de estado escalvista global, que BAP también odia, aunque por distintos motivos

Sea cual fuere vuestro objetivo, no os convirtáis en chivos expiatorios con mensajes anacrónicos del tipo "Sangre y patria", que son propagados o por obsesos, o por disidencia controlada. Sabed cuando la serpiente se está defendiendo

Vuestros modelos deben ser aquéllos que han funcionado: Trump, Orban, los movimientos italianos en ascenso, Sebastian Kurz y su partido en Austria. No caigáis en juegos de rol del tipo "Hablemos de la cuestión judía"

Es cierto que los objetivos finales de BAP y los de un Orban tienen poco o nada en común. Si los Orbans triunfaran, todo lo que conseguirían sería restablecer el mismo mundo de ovejas que existía hace 100 años (Nota de Gurney: En realidad, pongamos el mundo de antes de la I Guerra Mundial), con tal vez un inmunización contra ciertas degradaciones actuales...pero nada realmente grande. No obstante, es mejor que los países tengan bien cuidadas y felices a sus ovejas, antes que las reduzcan a montones de ratas hambrientas

BAP ha escrito este libro, no obstante, porque puede que sólo esta alianza circunstancial para el problema inmediato no satisfaga a algunos de nosotros, y quiere hablar del mundo que viene en las siguientes décadas, y qué caminos se abren para un destino diferente

 

[Ancient Warrior]

Skoll

 

[Gurney]

 

[Gurney]

Dispelling Beauty Lies

The truth about feminine beauty.

www.jsanilac.com

El autor (o puede que autora), en Twitter: https://twitter.com/EvilVizier

 

[Gurney]

67
Too much is already said about the evils of suburbs, but I think the danger of such places for modern civilized man is so great that it must be repeated. On the other hand it’s important not to take this too far: the Europeans live in the center of their cities and are politically and socially in just as bad or worse situations. Still, I think it’s easier for them to fix their problems, and to avert the greatest dangers, should they arrive. It’s easier because in these places the rightful citizens of the nations still own their cities. I don’t see any evidence that the tax base of America moved to the suburbs by choice. Their inner cities were taken away from them not, as is imagined, by blacks, but by the politicians—and their handlers—who found it more profitable to replace middle class citizens with an underclass. The space to which they’ve been segregated and to which they have to “commute” is I think a form of absolute hell to raise children in, especially boys. There is no freedom of motion except to regimented activities, they are always watched by caretakers of some kind. The places are of incredible ugliness, which takes away also from the will to discover new things at all. There are no nooks and corners where boys can form gangs, be away from prying eyes of parents and others, and have the feeling that they are exploring and owning territory, as there is in the city and in the countryside.

America has successfully portioned off its historical population, its rightful citizens, and its tax base, in work camps and dormitories. That is what the modern American “city” is: an economic zone arranged much like a work-camp, or concentration- camp if you want. It would be trivial for the French security services to shut off access to the banlieues infested by turds, and it would be just as trivial for American security services to shut off access to the suburbs and hold the middle class by the neck. I think the reason the suburbs are hateful to the raising of boys is also the reason they are most objectionable in general, namely that while in the countryside or the city a restive population would be able to hold their territory and challenge a power should the need arise, such a thing is impossible in the suburbs. Suburbs are living arrangement for slaves and subjects.


BAP habla contra los suburbios: son un peligro, pero es importante no sobrevalorarlos, porque los europeos viven en el centro de sus ciudades (Nota de Gurney: Es la visión de alguien de fuera. Un español le diría que depende de cada ciudad - No obstante, el juicio de BAP es certero) y política y socialmente están en situaciones tan malas o aún peores que en Estados Unidos

En Estados Unidos, el interior de las ciudades no fue arrebatado a la base tributaria por, como podría imaginarse, los personas de color, sino por los políticos, que descubrieron que era más provechoso reemplazar a la clase media por el lumpen. Y el espacio al que fueron segregados y al que deben "desplazarse" es una forma de infierno absoluto para criar a los niños, especialmente a los chicos: no hay libertad de movimiento, salvo en actividades regiementadas, siempre observadas por cuidadores de algún tipo. Los lugares son de una antiestéticaldad increíble, que arrebata la voluntad de descubrir nuevas cosas. No hay rincones ni esquinas donde los chicos puedan formar bandas, y estar al margen de los ojos fisgones de sus padres y de otros, y tener la sensación de que están explorando y poseyendo territorio, como sucede en la ciudad y en el campo

Son campos de trabajo y dormitorios. Eso es la "ciudad" de la moderna América: una zona económica, organizada como un campo de trabajo, o de concentración si lo preferís. Del mismo modo que sería fácil para los servicios franceses de seguridad cerrar el acceso a los banlieues (Nota de Gurney: los barrios de jovenlandeses que rodean París y otras ciudades de Francia), del mismo modo podría hacerse en America

Los suburbios son un estilo de vida para esclavos y sometidos