You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Zapatero's jewels: the gift that won't shield him from everything
Zapatero's jewels, valued at €1.3 million: the presidential gift defence may avoid a tax offence but not smuggling or money laundering. The judge is tracing their origin.
Zapatero and the jewels: why the presidential gift defence doesn't close the case
Can a gift received years ago keep a former prime minister out of prison? It depends on the offence. The jewels found in José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's office, valued at more than €1.3 million, open a legal labyrinth. If it is proven that he received them as gifts during his term (2004-2011), the tax offence may have expired under the statute of limitations. But smuggling and money laundering have no such fatal deadline.
The only jewel Zapatero officially declared during his eight years at Moncloa was a watch with emeralds from the Saudi king. The rest, according to the investigation, appear in no declaration. That is why the gift theory raises so many doubts: who gives women's jewellery to a president? Analysts point out that the real judicial target is not tax fraud, but tracing the origin of the pieces. One hypothesis under consideration is payments in kind linked to the Venezuelan Helicoidal scheme, which would make the jewels "blood money" rather than courtesy.
Among the divergent positions, some argue that the statute of limitations on the tax offence would be a safe-conduct; others recall that smuggling is a continuing offence and never expires. The judge, according to the evidence, is looking for provenance, not excuses. Meanwhile, the former prime minister stays silent and the jewels remain at the centre of the judicial storm.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (19 replies).
A forum user demands Pedro Sánchez's resignation within 72 hours; the thread speculates about October and claims Ceuta, the flooding and the volcano are no longer news.
The tweet claims Mari Carmen recovered her flat and her health in a couple of days; some read the wheelchair and nightgown scene as a staged performance
A worker has removed the eagle from the Palace of Justice. The controversy centres on whether the piece was preserved or destroyed, something Spain's historical memory law does not allow.
A viral tweet attributes the theft and burning of a fire engine in Marseille to second- and third-generation youths, with no official confirmation whatsoever