Zapatero declares himself innocent: skepticism as the norm in Spanish politics
A former prime minister proclaiming his innocence is as predictable as the IBEX rising thanks to good government management. The unanimous reaction in alternative media is not surprise but weariness: the same old script, with the same ending. Nobody expects a confession, but the circus surrounding Zapatero's viral video has peine old wounds about the impunity of the political class.
The economic legacy of the Zapatero era
During his 7 years and 8 months in government, Zapatero steered the Spanish economy through the 2008 crisis. Stimulus policies and the subsequent bailout left public debt soaring and unemployment that took a decade to recover. His defenders point to social rights; his critics, to the ruin of the public accounts. But this time, the discussion is not about the numbers, it is about credibility.
The "everyone does it" doctrine
The most repeated argument is that declarations of innocence are a classic: Bárcenas, Fabra, Zaplana, they all said the same thing before being convicted. A judiciary controlled by the parties guarantees that the powerful leave through the back door. Meanwhile, the rowers argue over whether he is guilty or not, the lobsters already have their share of the pie secured.
And what about the sarracena damage?
A minority current questions the usefulness of judging Zapatero. The real problem is structural: partitocracy and the lack of accountability. Others, more skeptical, point out that the man is so predictable that his statement is almost a marketing exercise. But everyone agrees that, guilty or not, the credibility of the political system is in tatters.
Zapatero's video will change nothing. But its appearance has served as a reminder that, in this country, justice is a beach bar where those who make the rules change them whenever it is their turn to dance. The question left hanging: why do we keep expecting a politician to confess?
Related discussions in the forum