World Cup 2026: corruption claims and street parties split fans

The World Cup nobody watches in full but everyone talks about

A self-confessed football fan admits he has not watched a single full match of this World Cup. He is not alone. Amid corruption claims, favoritism and questionable organization, the tournament has sparked a debate that goes far beyond the pitch.

Hosted across three countries, two of which – according to critics – look down on football, the 2026 World Cup has been mired in controversy since before the opening whistle. FIFA is accused of pressuring officials to overturn red cards, shielding favorite teams and refereeing that, in some people's words, recalled the sports colonialism of the 19th century. The shadow of Infantino, eager for another title for Messi, looms over every decision.

But some see it as the best tournament in years. The expansion to more national teams has produced close matches and surprises, with thousands of people – many of immigrant origin – filling the streets and living football as a festival. Summer schedules and cheap beer help, but the strongest argument is the thrill of every game.

• Hosted across 3 countries.
• Corruption claims over refereeing decisions.
• Expansion to 48 national teams, with tighter matches.

One viewer sums up the paradox: he started out determined not to watch and ended up hooked – the murkier the match, the more he enjoys it. Others, meanwhile, find out about goals from their neighbors' shouts, whom they call "sheep." Between the two camps, the World Cup has become a mirror of social divides: immigration, national pride and distrust of sports institutions.

The striking figure: while purists denounce corruption, the TV audiences and street atmosphere suggest the show works. Are we looking at the worst World Cup in history or the best? It depends on who you ask.