Choosing between two women as if they were cups: the handbook of digital misogyny
A thread of barely ten replies in a subforum called Guardería (Daycare) sums up the state of digital misogyny. Without shame or filter, participants reduce two women to objects of comparison: visible tattoos, estimated age, presumed promiscuity. The cup, in this context, is not a container but a metaphor for objectification.
The pick goes to the option without tattoos, considered less of an «old hen». The criterion is as arbitrary as it is offensive: the age and sensual history of people they have never met are simply assumed. Misogyny dresses itself up as crude humour, but the message is crystal clear: a woman's worth is measured by her looks and her «availability».
Only a couple of dissenting voices call the thread «disgusting» and «vile», but the prevailing tone is contempt. Meanwhile, the question in the title —which cup would you pick?— reveals the core of it: women as disposable objects. In reality, the choice is not made by the thread but by the reader: to take it as a joke or to call it out as a symptom.
Related threads on the forum
Real Madrid 2025/26 thread. Year I after Modric and Cesard. The advent of Franco. · 84244 replies
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (26 replies).
Analysis of the heated forum debate on journalist Ainhoa Martínez’s childfree choice at 36, highlighting the clash between professional success and biological clock in Spain.
A tweet showing four women at a party reignites the debate between natural and enhanced looks, with rejection of the artificial aesthetic and doubts over whether it's AI.
A forum user claims that "Karim is a good person" and another replies that this is hard to say given his origins. The thread turns into a debate about identity and how the West classifies newcomers.