You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Women in public office: inefficiency or bias?
A former civil servant criticises women's performance in public office. Structural problem or bias? The debate over Spain's public administration reignites without data.
The debate over the efficiency of women civil servants
A former Spanish Justice Administration civil servant with 15 years of experience has peine the discussion on women's performance in public positions, denouncing arrogance and inefficiency in courts, notary offices and town halls. The criticism focuses on the mediocrity that, according to some, goes unpunished in the civil service and is even rewarded, allowing incompetent or psychopathic profiles to be promoted. Although the debate focuses on women, the underlying problem would be structural: the lack of mechanisms to assess and penalise performance in the administration.
The discussion quickly turns into personal attacks and discriminatory remarks, obscuring any real analysis. The perception that the public administration has performed worse since more women joined is not backed by solid data, but it reflects a latent social tension. The former civil servant, who now makes a living giving private lessons to children, adds a layer of precarity to her story, though she also expresses controversial views (anti-vaccine) that divert attention from the core of the problem. The debate remains open without conclusive data on the relationship between gender and public-sector efficiency.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (26 replies).
A video from Gijón, Spain shows a young woman assaulting her partner and flying into a rage when confronted. The debate over double standards in gender violence is back.
A photo of Sánchez with the Jewish community exposes the double standard of anti-system critics, who fall silent when conspiracy rhetoric clashes with their sympathy.