You may have experienced this when asking for an invoice or dictating an account number: someone says "twenty million seven hundred eighty-nine thousand" and you stare blankly. It is not a joke nor a millionaire aspiration; it is the legacy of the old Documento Nacional de Identidad (Spanish National ID), issued before the 1980s. The reason for speaking in millions has an administrative and educational explanation, though not everyone agrees on its accuracy.
The DNI read as a large number
The old DNI model was printed with separator dots every three digits, just like any other figure. The number did not end with a letter and, in many cases, was a low number: early documents had six digits. Therefore, those who memorized it did so as a complete number: twenty million, seven hundred eighty-nine thousand, and so on. This is exactly what explains the messages circulating online recently: people perceive the document as a single figure, not as a sequence of digits.
The letter that changed everything
In 1985, coinciding with a new DNI model, the verification letter —the NIF— was introduced, and fields such as profession, marital status, or blood group disappeared. The letter is calculated from the number using a known algorithm. This change broke the 'natural' reading of the number: it was no longer a pure number but an alphanumeric code. Younger people, who only knew the format with the letter, dictate it digit by digit or in pairs. Those who learned it earlier continue to recite it as a number, revealing their age.
Number or code? Law and custom
Some argue that the DNI is a number, based on the law governing the document itself. Others claim it is a code because the letter is an artifice and the digits do not represent a quantity. The debate is interesting, but practice prevails: the way it is said is a mnemonic rule. Some group them in twos, others in threes, and some need to say it all together to avoid getting lost.
Franco, number 1, and other data that no longer fit
The DNI was created during the Franco regime. Francisco Franco took number 1, and his vvife, Carmen Polo, took number 2. A low number was synonymous with privilege and seniority. At the time, if assigned a very low number, it was said one had received a deceased person's number. Over time, numbering has exceeded 20 million, and the final letter has turned the document into a hybrid that is neither fully a number nor a code.
Rote learning or memory: the debate continues
Some see this habit as a sign of rote learning; others, as proof of good memory. The irony is that while some laugh at those who say "millions," older people might ask why young people cannot read an eight-digit number aloud. Schools, which taught syntactic reading of large numbers to reinforce place value, are no longer what they used to be.
Ultimately, the explanation is bureaucratic, not obscure. The old DNI was written with dots and without a letter, and those who learned it still read it that way. Next time someone drops a "million" at a counter, you will know why: it is not that they think they are rich, but that they learned to read numbers in a format that no longer exists. The rest is a generational war over memorization methods.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (190 replies).
A forum discussion on dealing with irrational behavior explores strategies ranging from social withdrawal to imposing informal penalties on difficult clients.
Twelve years into his reign, the tension between King Felipe VI and the Spanish government remains unexploded. Supporters who despise him clash with those who defend him.