Why is the Ábalos case called the Koldo case?

Why is the Ábalos case known as the Koldo case? We analyse the debate over political and media responsibility in the COVID mask corruption plot.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Why is the Ábalos case called the Koldo case?

The public debate over the alleged corruption plot linked to the purchase of medical supplies during the pandemic has sparked notable controversy over the media and judicial naming of the case. While headlines focus on Koldo García, a former ministerial adviser, various voices question whether this label hides a higher-level political responsibility reaching senior officials and the party apparatus itself.

Key points about the case

  • Hierarchy in contract signing: The focus falls on administrative decision-making power, noting that public documents and official contracts bore the signature of José Luis Ábalos, then minister, and not exclusively that of his subordinates.
  • The role of the middleman: One line of analysis identifies Koldo García as the plot's "fixer" or executor, taking on direct responsibilities while the core of power remains removed from operational management.

What forum members think about the case

Those who argue the name is a smokescreen: They contend that limiting the case to an adviser is a deliberate strategy to protect the PSOE leadership and the current political system. For this group, reducing responsibility to a single individual is a form of media "sheep-like" behaviour that ignores how the chain of command actually works in institutions.​
Against them, those who see a systemic problem: They argue that the naming is irrelevant because the problem is not an individual or a party, but the very functioning of the regime of '78. From this perspective, any attempt at personalisation is futile, since corruption would be a structural element inherent to the exercise of power in Spain.​

Why this thread is generating discussion

The thread stands out for its radical scepticism towards the official narrative, rejecting that the investigation ends at the lower levels of the administration. The discussion has become stuck on whether responsibility is purely administrative or whether we are facing a power architecture designed for middle-ranking officials to act as lightning rods for potential irregularities.



Want to know the hidden details and documentary evidence that the media omit? Register on Burbuja.info to access uncensored analyses and join the freest debate on the web.

Related debates on the forum

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (802 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back