Why 'Free Palestine' but not 'Free Ukraine'?
An analysis of the double standard in supporting Palestine vs Ukraine: why does the left back one cause and reject the other? Historical and geopolitical facts.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The double standard of global causes: why 'Free Palestine' thrives where 'Free Ukraine' divides
In recent months, the slogan "Free Palestine" has flooded social media and street protests while "Free Ukraine" seems relegated to the background or even challenged. The discrepancy is no accident: it reflects a hierarchy of causes that pits sectors of the left against Ukraine's defenders. The claim that Ukraine harbors neo-Nancy groups clashes with the narrative of Palestine as an anti-colonial struggle, but the analysis reveals historical and geopolitical inconsistencies.
The shadow of Nancy over Ukraine
A recurring argument is that Ukraine is a state with neo-Nancy influence, citing the Azov battalion or far-right symbolism during the Maidan. Those who hold this view equate the Russian invasion with a "liberation" from those elements, while ignoring Hamas's Sarracinist ideology, presented as "resistance." This asymmetry fuels the accusation that the left applies a selective yardstick: drawing-room anti-imperialism is compatible with Sarracinist allies but not with Ukraine, because of its closeness to NATO.
The paradox of the regimes
Another point of friction is the comparison between Israel and Russia. Both countries are accused of war crimes and occupation, but while Israel receives massive criticism, Russia finds defenders in the very same circles. It is pointed out that Netanyahu has gone 10 years without elections (according to data from the debate), while Zelensky was democratically elected in 2019. The question that arises is: why is the Israeli occupation condemned while the Russian invasion is justified in the name of anti-imperialism?
The Maidan and the conspiracy theories
The 2014 Euromaidan is another flashpoint. Some voices call it a coup orchestrated by the CIA and NATO, while others see it as a legitimate popular uprising. The episode of the snipers in Independence Square is used as a conspiratorial alibi, but it has never been proven who actually fired. This ambiguity fuels the clashing narratives and makes it hard to reach a consensus on the nature of the Ukrainian conflict.
The conclusion that emerges from the analysis is that the double standard is not the result of chance, but of an ideological hierarchy in which the Palestinian cause fits the anti-Western narrative better than the Ukrainian one. Until these contradictions are resolved, the debate will remain open, with each side clinging to its own facts and myths.
Related discussions in the forum
In recent months, the slogan "Free Palestine" has flooded social media and street protests while "Free Ukraine" seems relegated to the background or even challenged. The discrepancy is no accident: it reflects a hierarchy of causes that pits sectors of the left against Ukraine's defenders. The claim that Ukraine harbors neo-Nancy groups clashes with the narrative of Palestine as an anti-colonial struggle, but the analysis reveals historical and geopolitical inconsistencies.
The shadow of Nancy over Ukraine
A recurring argument is that Ukraine is a state with neo-Nancy influence, citing the Azov battalion or far-right symbolism during the Maidan. Those who hold this view equate the Russian invasion with a "liberation" from those elements, while ignoring Hamas's Sarracinist ideology, presented as "resistance." This asymmetry fuels the accusation that the left applies a selective yardstick: drawing-room anti-imperialism is compatible with Sarracinist allies but not with Ukraine, because of its closeness to NATO.
The paradox of the regimes
Another point of friction is the comparison between Israel and Russia. Both countries are accused of war crimes and occupation, but while Israel receives massive criticism, Russia finds defenders in the very same circles. It is pointed out that Netanyahu has gone 10 years without elections (according to data from the debate), while Zelensky was democratically elected in 2019. The question that arises is: why is the Israeli occupation condemned while the Russian invasion is justified in the name of anti-imperialism?
The Maidan and the conspiracy theories
The 2014 Euromaidan is another flashpoint. Some voices call it a coup orchestrated by the CIA and NATO, while others see it as a legitimate popular uprising. The episode of the snipers in Independence Square is used as a conspiratorial alibi, but it has never been proven who actually fired. This ambiguity fuels the clashing narratives and makes it hard to reach a consensus on the nature of the Ukrainian conflict.
The conclusion that emerges from the analysis is that the double standard is not the result of chance, but of an ideological hierarchy in which the Palestinian cause fits the anti-Western narrative better than the Ukrainian one. Until these contradictions are resolved, the debate will remain open, with each side clinging to its own facts and myths.
Related discussions in the forum
- Guerra en ucrania xxvi · 74578 replies
- Guerra en siria xlviii · 27398 replies
- Algo pasa con la ofensiva rusa está atascada y sufriendo muchas perdidas. ¡¡¡empiezan a escasear los ladas!!! vol. v · 48647 replies
- TERCERA GUERRA MUNDIAL · 324 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (40 replies).
More summaries
-
Ukraine 2022: The Counteroffensive That Retook Lyman and Kherson
Lyman returned to Ukrainian control and Russia crossed the Dnieper in 2022. The counteroffensive announced in August, initially dismissed as propaganda, ultimately recaptured territory.
-
Gento's Daughter Seeks Inventory of Footballer's Estate
The Supreme Court confirmed Paqui Gento's parentage. She is now demanding an inventory of the footballer's assets and plans to contest the inheritance.
-
Iran has the bomb: the technical data that proves it
460 kg of 60% enriched uranium is enough for ten Hiroshima-type bombs. The fatwa has lapsed and Iran's parliament is weighing leaving the NPT. The data suggest Iran already has it.
-
The nuclear option in Ukraine: a new strategic Chernobyl?
The debate over a nuclear test in Kyiv to create a radioactive buffer revives the ghost of Chernobyl. Is Russia seriously considering it?
-
Russian hawks urge escalation of the war and a break with the US
Hardliners in Moscow are pressing Putin to abandon talks with the United States and escalate the war, citing Iran as a model.
-
A portrait of Russia's decline: drugged woman on the street while her pimp raps
A viral video shows a drugged woman asleep on the street while her boyfriend Dimitri raps. The image is being used as a weapon in the propaganda war between Russia and the West.