Pasolini: genius or overrated? The controversy that never ends
Questioning the cultural canon comes at a price: you get called ignorant, or praised for daring. That is what happens with Pier Paolo Pasolini. Analyzing his work unleashes conflicting passions: for some, he is a visionary who foresaw the fascism of the future; for others, a mediocre filmmaker who thrived thanks to the weak competition of his era and left-wing propaganda.
Why critics reject him
Detractors point out that most of his films are "crap" and that only Novecento is worth saving… except Novecento is not his, it is Bertolucci's. A glaring mistake many keep repeating. He is accused of making propaganda cinema and of exploiting controversy: Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom is considered one of the most extreme and controversial cult films in history, but some see it as a gratuitous shock exercise.
The defense of his legacy
His defenders recall that Pasolini described the fascism of the future with a lucidity that frightens today. "When he spoke of the fascism of the future, he described our times," one line of analysis asserts. Moreover, his murder in 1975, shrouded in shadows and with a case file still open, has elevated him to the status of martyr. The suspicion that it was a political crime – and not a simple sensual quarrel gone wrong – feeds his myth.
The mystery of his death
Pasolini's death remains a blind spot. Some claim he was murdered over a sensual abuse that was covered up; others point to political motives. The case file "remains open to this day," according to journalistic sources, which prevents closing the story. Meanwhile, his figure keeps generating more noise than consensus.
The question remains: is Pasolini a titan of cinema or a name inflated by the epic of his death? The answer, like his case file, remains open.
Related debates in the forum