You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why do many Spanish progressives and conservatives dislike trams?
A viral post claims trams are sold as obsolete in Spain while France keeps building them in mid-sized cities. The data and context behind the transport debate.
A viral post claims that in Spain trams are presented as obsolete while in France cities of more than 200,000 inhabitants rely on them. The claim mixes a political perception with a very different reality of urban planning.
A post on X compares the state of trams in Spain with that of France, claiming that here they are sold as "obsolete" while across the Pyrenees there is no city of more than **200,000 inhabitants** that does not depend on them. The message offers no data of its own, but it taps into a genuine frustration about how this mode of transport has been treated in recent decades.
## The tram that was dismantled and the one that came back
Spain had trams in almost every provincial capital until the **sixties** and **seventies** of the last century. Many networks were ripped up to make room for the car. The comeback came late and unevenly: Valencia, Bilbao, Barcelona and Zaragoza have built new lines, but other cities still have no service. The comparison with France is not gratuitous: there, more networks were kept and expanded earlier.
## Why the debate turns political
The viral message is not about engineering, it is about narrative. Those sharing it claim there is a deliberate attempt to portray the tram as outdated in order to avoid investing in it. That reading fits into a broader discussion about the mobility model, the use of public space and the split of funding between roads and urban rail transport. There is no single technical cause: there are budget decisions and political priorities.
## What the French numbers say
In France, cities such as **Nantes**, **Strasbourg** or **Montpellier** brought back the tram between the **eighties** and the **2000s**. Not every city of more than 200,000 inhabitants has a tram, but many have made it the backbone of their network. The claim in the message is a generalisation, not a census. Even so, the contrast with Spain exists and fuels the criticism.
## The cost and the underlying question
A tram costs between **20** and **40 million euros per kilometre**, depending on the type of works. It is more expensive than a bus, but it has more capacity and shapes urban development. The question lurking behind the message is not whether the tram is old, but who decides which transport deserves investment and what narrative is built around it.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (0 replies).
A tweet compares the per capita income of two cities to conclude which is "richer". Nominal GDP ignores cost of living and distribution, and confusing the two leads to wrong conclusions.
A post on X claims 50 people attended a meeting in Madrid, Spain, and celebrates it as a woke victory. It names no organizers or date, fueling the debate.
A video claiming Bukele had banned Halloween was a deepfake: the voice did not match the mouth, and no trace of the measure exists in official sources.
A Tesla travelling at high speed collided with a pickup in Newmarket, caught fire and killed its driver. The debate over electric car safety, over the…
A viral tweet ironically points out the overlap between a real case and a work of fiction. We explain what "any resemblance to reality" means and why the phrase is used.