Who should a pro-burbumori vote for? The PSOE.
A commentator argues for voting PSOE so that it takes on the debt crisis and the coming austerity cuts. We explain what he claims and why it sparks debate.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The thesis is that the PP should win the election so it takes on the debt crisis, the default and the looming austerity cuts, and that is why voting PSOE makes sense. It is an opinion attributed to a commentator, not a verified fact.
The commentator **Isaac Jiménez** has argued on the social network X that in the upcoming election people should vote for the **PSOE** (Spain's Socialist Party). His argument is not one of ideological affinity. He claims that a debt crisis, a default and savage cuts are coming, and that the party which, in his view, caused the situation should bear the political cost.
## What the message actually says
The post proposes an inversion of tactical voting. If the **PP** (Spain's main conservative party) wins an absolute majority, he reasons, it will be the PP that has to manage the debt crisis and implement the cuts. To avoid that, he suggests voting **PSOE** so that it "takes the hit" and suffers the consequences of its own actions.
This is a political hypothesis, not a substantiated economic forecast. The debt crisis and default he mentions were not confirmed by any official body at the time the post was published.
## Why this argument circulates
The idea taps into a diffuse economic unease: high public debt, interest rates making financing more expensive, and social spending under pressure. In that context, some voters look to punish one particular party rather than support another.
The problem is that the premise is unproven. A default by a eurozone state is not something that can be taken for granted. And cuts depend on who governs, with what majority and under what circumstances.
## What to keep in mind
The post is an opinion attributed to a commentator, not an economic fact. The debt crisis and default he takes for granted are his own forecast, not an established fact.
If anyone decides their vote based on this reasoning, they should check the debt figures, maturities and official forecasts for themselves before taking it at face value.
The commentator **Isaac Jiménez** has argued on the social network X that in the upcoming election people should vote for the **PSOE** (Spain's Socialist Party). His argument is not one of ideological affinity. He claims that a debt crisis, a default and savage cuts are coming, and that the party which, in his view, caused the situation should bear the political cost.
## What the message actually says
The post proposes an inversion of tactical voting. If the **PP** (Spain's main conservative party) wins an absolute majority, he reasons, it will be the PP that has to manage the debt crisis and implement the cuts. To avoid that, he suggests voting **PSOE** so that it "takes the hit" and suffers the consequences of its own actions.
This is a political hypothesis, not a substantiated economic forecast. The debt crisis and default he mentions were not confirmed by any official body at the time the post was published.
## Why this argument circulates
The idea taps into a diffuse economic unease: high public debt, interest rates making financing more expensive, and social spending under pressure. In that context, some voters look to punish one particular party rather than support another.
The problem is that the premise is unproven. A default by a eurozone state is not something that can be taken for granted. And cuts depend on who governs, with what majority and under what circumstances.
## What to keep in mind
The post is an opinion attributed to a commentator, not an economic fact. The debt crisis and default he takes for granted are his own forecast, not an established fact.
If anyone decides their vote based on this reasoning, they should check the debt figures, maturities and official forecasts for themselves before taking it at face value.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (3 replies).
More summaries
-
Sánchez challenges Ferreras on PP vote share
In a laSexta interview, Sánchez questioned who votes for the PP. Ferreras corrected him, noting it is Spain's most voted party.
-
The Red or Blue Button Dilemma: A Reflection of Collective Irrationality?
Analysis of the red/blue button dilemma: Is collective survival possible if 53% choose a moral risk?
-
Elon Musk and restricted suffrage: should only taxpayers vote?
Elon Musk suggests limiting the vote to DARPA contractors. The debate over restricted suffrage, Spain's IMV benefit and IQ filters is back in Spain.
-
Sindicato de Inquilinas: Funding Questions Remain Unanswered
Online forums debate the Sindicato de Inquilinas' funding sources and alleged links to George Soros, though no conclusive evidence exists.
-
Vestrynge and the migration U-turn: a left that no longer believes its own story
Vestrynge, co-founder of Podemos, points to the cost of migration for wages and reopens the left's contradiction: capital drives it, but no one limits it
-
Spain's Sánchez agrees to Jordi Wild interview and his campaign panics
Sánchez has accepted an interview on Jordi Wild's podcast with live fact-checking. His campaign fears an unscripted face-off and suspicions of a pre-agreed script.