Who actually pays for X Premium

An analysis of who really funds X Premium: from those who get it free due to a glitch to those who see it as a tool or as vanity.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Who really pays for X Premium

Ever since Elon Musk turned the blue tick into a paid service, the question of who funds it has never gone away. The debate reveals a polarised ecosystem where a computer glitch, vanity and professional calculation all coexist.

On one side are those who get it without spending a cent. One striking case: a user verified their card for a minimum advertising payment and, with no further steps, received Premium indefinitely. A back door that, if it became widespread, would explain why some people have it without subscribing. At the opposite end is the social badge: for a critical camp, the blue tick is a cheap self-esteem object, a fairground prize to feel important. And then there is the power user: someone who tweets daily and accumulates trinc values the real perks — more characters per post, monetisation — and sees the subscription as an investment.

Scepticism, however, dominates the debate. The phrase "nobody pays for it" is repeated like a mantra, fuelled by the platform's lack of transparency about its actual subscriber base. Until X publishes figures, Premium will remain that product everyone talks about but nobody seems willing to pay for.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (9 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back