Ever since Elon Musk turned the blue tick into a paid service, the question of who funds it has never gone away. The debate reveals a polarised ecosystem where a computer glitch, vanity and professional calculation all coexist.
On one side are those who get it without spending a cent. One striking case: a user verified their card for a minimum advertising payment and, with no further steps, received Premium indefinitely. A back door that, if it became widespread, would explain why some people have it without subscribing. At the opposite end is the social badge: for a critical camp, the blue tick is a cheap self-esteem object, a fairground prize to feel important. And then there is the power user: someone who tweets daily and accumulates trinc values the real perks — more characters per post, monetisation — and sees the subscription as an investment.
Scepticism, however, dominates the debate. The phrase "nobody pays for it" is repeated like a mantra, fuelled by the platform's lack of transparency about its actual subscriber base. Until X publishes figures, Premium will remain that product everyone talks about but nobody seems willing to pay for.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (9 replies).
Euthanasia in Spain takes at least 2 years depending on the case, while Canada processes assisted dying in 7 to 8 months. The law exists, but its real-world application is another matter.