When were the Gospels written? The evidence behind the dating debate
Papyri, inscriptions and a lost manuscript: what the evidence says about when the Gospels were written, and what remains unresolved.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Dating the Gospels is far from a settled matter
In the second century, a philosopher named Pantaenus lands in India and finds Christians keeping a copy of the Gospel of Matthew. So says Eusebius of Caesarea. Pious fiction or a memory of an early spread? The question is the best summary of a field where consensus hangs by a thread.
Mark or Matthew: which came first
The central question is Markan priority. Mark is the shortest gospel: 678 verses and 11,300 words, compared with Matthew's 1,071 verses and 18,300 words. For one dominant school, that disproportion indicates that Matthew and Luke drew on Mark and on a sayings source called Q. For another school, the patristic tradition and the Pantaenus episode point to Matthew, the most Jewish and messianic of the gospels, having been written first. The balance of academic criticism today tilts toward Mark, but the case is not closed: Luke himself acknowledges that "many" accounts already existed when he wrote his own.
Papyri, inscriptions and Paul's "new testament"
The material evidence does not settle the order, but it narrows the window. Some 40 Egyptian papyri with New Testament texts are known from before the year 300. P52, dated between 125 and 150, contains a fragment of John. P104, from the mid-second century, copies Matthew. By around the year 200, all four gospels were already circulating in codex form. Archaeology adds pieces: the Erastus inscription in Corinth, dated between 50 and 70, fits the figure in Romans 16:23; the Gallio inscription anchors Paul in Achaia. And there is a philological argument that unsettles things: in 2 Corinthians 3:14, Paul speaks of "the reading of the old covenant." If there is an old one, is there also a new covenant already written down?
The secret Gospel of Mark, the affair that never closes
The debate has its cursed piece: the so-called secret Gospel of Mark. Morton Smith found it in 1958 at the Mar Saba monastery; it was a letter from Clement of Alexandria containing an episode of Jesus and a naked young man. The manuscript disappeared in 1990, and suspicion of forgery hung over it for decades. A thesis from the University of Helsinki, supported by forensic analysis of the handwriting, argues that the text is not a fraud and that the accusation was based on poor-quality photographs. The original remains lost. As in so many corners of ancient history, the physical evidence is a ghost.
What this overview leaves behind is uncomfortable for everyone. Neither is Markan priority an unassailable dogma, nor does the historicity of the gospel narrative collapse for lack of anchors. By the year 200 all four gospels were in circulation, and already in Paul's time an "old covenant" was being read that presupposed something new. Until a papyrus turns up that settles the order, dating will remain a battleground between philologists, archaeologists and skeptics.
In the second century, a philosopher named Pantaenus lands in India and finds Christians keeping a copy of the Gospel of Matthew. So says Eusebius of Caesarea. Pious fiction or a memory of an early spread? The question is the best summary of a field where consensus hangs by a thread.
Mark or Matthew: which came first
The central question is Markan priority. Mark is the shortest gospel: 678 verses and 11,300 words, compared with Matthew's 1,071 verses and 18,300 words. For one dominant school, that disproportion indicates that Matthew and Luke drew on Mark and on a sayings source called Q. For another school, the patristic tradition and the Pantaenus episode point to Matthew, the most Jewish and messianic of the gospels, having been written first. The balance of academic criticism today tilts toward Mark, but the case is not closed: Luke himself acknowledges that "many" accounts already existed when he wrote his own.
Papyri, inscriptions and Paul's "new testament"
The material evidence does not settle the order, but it narrows the window. Some 40 Egyptian papyri with New Testament texts are known from before the year 300. P52, dated between 125 and 150, contains a fragment of John. P104, from the mid-second century, copies Matthew. By around the year 200, all four gospels were already circulating in codex form. Archaeology adds pieces: the Erastus inscription in Corinth, dated between 50 and 70, fits the figure in Romans 16:23; the Gallio inscription anchors Paul in Achaia. And there is a philological argument that unsettles things: in 2 Corinthians 3:14, Paul speaks of "the reading of the old covenant." If there is an old one, is there also a new covenant already written down?
The secret Gospel of Mark, the affair that never closes
The debate has its cursed piece: the so-called secret Gospel of Mark. Morton Smith found it in 1958 at the Mar Saba monastery; it was a letter from Clement of Alexandria containing an episode of Jesus and a naked young man. The manuscript disappeared in 1990, and suspicion of forgery hung over it for decades. A thesis from the University of Helsinki, supported by forensic analysis of the handwriting, argues that the text is not a fraud and that the accusation was based on poor-quality photographs. The original remains lost. As in so many corners of ancient history, the physical evidence is a ghost.
What this overview leaves behind is uncomfortable for everyone. Neither is Markan priority an unassailable dogma, nor does the historicity of the gospel narrative collapse for lack of anchors. By the year 200 all four gospels were in circulation, and already in Paul's time an "old covenant" was being read that presupposed something new. Until a papyrus turns up that settles the order, dating will remain a battleground between philologists, archaeologists and skeptics.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (59 replies).
More summaries
-
Tartessos Was Real: Argantonio’s Wall Found in Phocaea
Archaeologists found the wall in Phocaea attributed by Herodotus to Tartessian King Argantonio, confirming his construction description.
-
ETA and GAL: two arms of the same Gladio network in Spain
Investigation linking ETA and GAL as arms of the same NATO Gladio network, with drug trafficking funding and CIA control.
-
Alfredo Landa and landismo: psychological operation or mirror of an era?
Alfredo Landa's cinema as a tool for demoralizing the Spanish man: the thesis dividing analysts, and the historical roots of landismo in 1970s Spain.
-
Why Asturians in Spain feel Spanish without hesitation
Genetics, a language of their own and a history tied to the Reconquista: why Asturias feels Spanish with no qualms.
-
Paris bohemian life in 1850: the underworld Marx lumped together
Marx placed criminals, ragpickers and bohemian writers in the lumpenproletariat. The list portrays Paris in 1850 and its marginal underworld.
-
Nietzsche and Marx: rescuing uncomfortable ideas from distortion
Reading Nietzsche and Marx directly reveals uncomfortable conclusions, links to the ancient debt jubilee, and justified anger at how their ideas have been distorted.