You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
What the law says about songs created with Suno
If you register your lyrics and pay for Suno's Pro plan, the law protects your text and your audio file, but not the instrumental composition generated by the algorithm.
Lyrics you write and register with SGAE (Spain's music copyright society) are protected as human work, and you can sue for plagiarism if someone copies them. The instrumental music Suno generates has no such protection, because the law does not recognize it as human creation.
There is a scene that keeps repeating itself in law firms specializing in intellectual property. A musician arrives with a song made with **Suno**, has uploaded it to Spotify, and discovers that someone has taken their instrumental track and put different lyrics to it. They want to sue. The answer depends on which part of the song is at stake.
## Lyrics written by a person are intellectual property
The text of a song — the verses, the phrases, the structure of the chorus — is a literary work. If you write it yourself, the law protects it from the moment of its creation, and if you also register it with the **SGAE**, the collecting society takes care of claiming copyright and royalties when someone uses it without permission.
That means that if another person takes your verses and puts them into another song, you can sue for plagiarism. The SGAE steps in to claim what is rightfully yours. Your text is protected, registered or not, although registration makes proof much easier.
## AI-generated instrumental music has no human owner
Here comes the nuance many people are unaware of. The instrumental arrangements, rhythms, and background harmonies produced by **Suno's** algorithm are not considered human creation. Intellectual property law requires an author who is a natural person. No author, no rights.
If someone takes that exact instrumental track and adds completely different lyrics written by them, you are legally not protected over that music. You cannot claim copyright over something you did not create. The musical idea — replaying the same chords, imitating the rhythm — is not protectable either.
## The audio file does have an owner if you pay for the Pro plan
There is a key difference between the musical composition and the recording. If you pay for Suno's **Pro** plan, the company assigns you ownership of the resulting sound file. That file is yours as a recording, even if the composition is not.
If someone downloads your song from **Spotify** and re-uploads it as is to profit from it, digital protection systems like YouTube's **Content ID** detect it and block it. Not because of the musical composition, but because of infringing your commercial distribution rights over that physical audio file. It is the fastest and most effective route, even if it does not go through the SGAE.
## What to do before publishing
Register the lyrics with the SGAE before uploading the song. Keep the original files with dates. And be clear that strong protection lies in the text and the recording, not in the music the machine generates.
If the matter affects you financially, it is advisable to consult a lawyer specializing in intellectual property before making decisions.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (8 replies).
Collecting donations via Bizum on the street leaves donors without receipts or verification of where the money goes. Unproven accusations tarnish the case.
ERC Barcelona condemns Saturday's disturbances and calls on the City Council and the Generalitat to explain the lack of foresight and support for businesses.