What if I told you that cold doesn't exist?

Does cold really exist, or is it just the absence of heat? The physics and philosophy debate tearing the forum apart. We break down this heated thread on thermodynamics.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

What if I told you that cold doesn't exist?
Does cold exist? The physics debate dividing the forum

Is cold a real quantity or simply a sensory illusion caused by the absence of heat? The thread that's setting the forum on fire questions our basic perception of temperature and pits users against each other in a dialectical battle between thermodynamics, hermetic philosophy and pure, unfiltered trolling.

What's at stake

  • The core of the debate: The premise put forward by one user that cold doesn't exist as a physical entity, but is merely the lack of thermal energy (heat). A claim that became the spark for questioning everything from particle physics to our very ability to understand reality.
  • The rift: The forum has split between those defending a purely scientific and technical view based on molecular kinetics, and those who see this distinction as a dualistic construct of the human mind to categorize the universe.
  • The detail nobody expected: The arrival of theories about universal polarity and the comparison of cold with darkness —as a mere absence of light—, turning a thread that started with "I've done my homework" into an almost metaphysical debate.

What forum users are saying about "what if I told you that cold doesn't exist"

Position A (The Scientists): They argue that cold is a human convention. For them, temperature is just a measure of the kinetic energy of molecules; therefore, you can't "add cold", you can only remove heat. It's the most technical position and the one that has most angered those looking for a less academic discussion.​
Position B (The Dualists): They maintain that, although at the molecular level it's an absence, duality is the only way humans can understand the universe. For this camp, trying to deny cold is denying the very structure of our perception: everything polarizes into irreconcilable extremes.​
Position C (The "level" skeptics): A group that, far from engaging with the physics, uses the thread to measure the egos of the participants. Here the real debate isn't temperature, but who has the intellectual capacity to "sit at the grown-ups' table" and who is merely a beginner student.​

Why this thread won't leave you indifferent

This thread is the perfect example of how a basic academic premise can degenerate into an exercise in cynicism, cheap philosophy and forum spite. If you think you know how the world works, this debate will make you doubt whether your certainties are facts or just labels put in place to keep you from going mad.


This summary is just the surface. The full thread has 20 replies with data, sources, analysis and the unfiltered debate — registered users only. Create your free account in 30 seconds and join the debate.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this thread are speculative and recreational in nature. They do not constitute scientific advice and should not be taken as proven facts for making technical or health-related decisions.

Related debates on the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (20 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back