What Could Cost Sánchez His Career (Luis Ventoso in El Debate)

The judge **Beatriz Biedma**, who handled the case against the president's brother, has joined the inquiry into the PSOE corruption case as a private complainant in the National High Court. This judicial move, focused on alleged attempts to discredit investigators, could have significant implications for **Sánchez**, especially if he loses power.

## The Judge Joins the PSOE Corruption Inquiry

A development this Wednesday has caused considerable concern for the Prime Minister. **Beatriz Biedma**, the magistrate who oversaw the investigation culminating in the conviction of the president's brother, has joined the National High Court inquiry as a private complainant. Her presence adds to the case regarding the alleged 'PSOE drains' (cloacas del PSOE), a scheme investigating purported attempts to discredit civil guards, prosecutors, and judges who investigated corruption linked to his family and the party. The judge has stated that the scheme, allegedly orchestrated by figures like **Cerdán** and **Leire**, reached out to the services of a traficante clan from Badajoz for its purposes.

## A Formidable Adversary to the Plot

The judge **Beatriz Biedma** is no ordinary figure in the judicial landscape. She is described as a rigorous, tenacious magistrate with an impeccable work ethic. These qualities make her a formidable adversary to those involved in the corruption plot and, above all, to the possible 'higher powers' who allegedly instigated these operations. **Biedma**’s involvement adds a layer of complexity and seriousness to the investigation, raising the stakes for those who may be involved in this alleged dirty war.

## Sánchez's Achilles' Heel

The case involving the president’s brother, **David Sánchez**, exposes a vulnerability for **Sánchez**. **David**, described as an eccentric character detached from politics, lives in his own world and lacks the necessary contacts in Ferraz to orchestrate an operation of such magnitude. The question arises: who possessed those contacts, and who could have ordered the work to discredit those investigating the family? The answer, it is suggested, does not require extraordinary detective skills. The main antiestéticar is that, faced with the prospect of severe sentences for the corruption scheme, figures like **Cerdán** and **Leire** might seek collaboration agreements, implicating those who gave them the superior instruction. This scenario could have direct and grave consequences for the president, who resists relinquishing power, viewing it as his last defense.