Wake Up From a Fruit Once

An analysis of Jeffrey Sachs' role in the 2030 Agenda, shock therapy in Russia, and how the war narrative serves global control. Data and positions inside

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Jeffrey Sachs, the 2030 Agenda and the World War III narrative: toward an orchestrated destruction?

At a conference in India, Jeffrey Sachs laid out with crystal clarity what many call the "master plan": an existential crisis (pandemic, energy war or armed conflict) trinc by solutions that concentrate power. The paradox is that Sachs, the same man who advised the shock therapy that dismantled the Russian economy in the 90s and who now promotes the UN's 2030 Agenda, is presented as a peace guru. The contradiction is not really one if you read him as a mercenary of the narrative.

The 'useful intellectual' of globalism

Sachs is the archetype of the globalist technocrat. His consistency is that of a cheque. In the 90s, he was the architect of the shock therapy that turned an industrial state into a bazaar looted by oligarchs. He did not fail: he achieved his goal of dismantling a rival power. Now, from within the UN, he sells the 2030 Agenda as a solution to poverty, when in reality it is social engineering under a multicoloured logo. The Sustainable Development Goals are the excuse to impose centralized control and surveillance. And his promotion of abortion, euthanasia and the climate scam fits the Malthusian logic of reducing the population and transferring wealth.

War as a tool of control

The debate centres on whether war is a deliberate instrument to strip the middle class and transfer sovereignty to an elite. Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Nord Stream and ELbichito are presented as manufactured or exploited crises. The "Faith Office" in the White House, run by a figure who seems straight out of a novel, reinforces the thesis that the end of this civilization is being sought. Meanwhile, sceptics point out that it is all an apocalyptic tale in which nothing ever happens, that quality of life slowly deteriorates without nuclear bombs.

The question that remains in the air: are we facing a real conspiracy or the cold logic of a system that needs perpetual growth? The uncomfortable fact is that Sachs and other players have sat on both sides of the table, and consistency is not their strong suit.

Related discussions in the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (17 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back