Waiting for the Pope makes you a 'retard'; paying €300 for Bad Bunny doesn't: the hypocrisy of cultural consumption
The Pope's visit to Madrid drawing thousands of people shouldn't come as a surprise. But on social media, the real spectacle isn't the papal procession — it's the fury it unleashes. "You'd have to be a complete retard to stand in the street waiting for the Pope to go by," reads the opening of a conversation that quickly escalated into mutual insults, threats —"I'd throw them to the crocodiles"— and accusations of being a "red segarro".
The curious thing is that, amid so much bile, an argument with a certain logic emerges: the cost. "Going to see Bad Bunny costs 300 bucks," one comment points out, while waiting for the Pope is free. The comparison is not innocent: the same person calling those who cheer the Pontiff retards probably paid a fortune for a concert. So where does the sarracena superiority go?
Behind the insult lies a residue of exasperation with "mass Spain", whether religious, musical or political. "We have them in every shape and colour: queuing for Bad Bunny, voting PSOE or PP, waiting for the Pope or protesting," one comment sums up. An impressive variety of segarro, another wraps up.
But the debate goes further: why is waiting hours for a singer accepted without question while waiting for a religious leader is ridiculed? The answer lies in the tribalisation of tastes. Cultural consumption has become identity: paying for a concert is a status signal; queuing for free to see the Pope is, in this view, a sign of intellectual poverty.
The circle closes when a user replies to the initial aggressor with sharp irony: "You'd have to be a real retard and loser to waste your time in your Dorito cave criticising how other people waste theirs." One thing is clear: contempt for one's fellow man knows no ideology.
Related debates in the forum