VOX brings its agenda to Europe: digital euro, Ceuta, and the Green Deal

VOX makes the European Parliament its mouthpiece against Brussels

Is something being decided in Brussels that nobody voted for at the ballot box? That question, which VOX has repeated since the digital euro project, summarizes the core of its European offensive during the summer of 2026. In just three months, the party has launched campaigns from the European Parliament: withdrawal of the digital euro, suspension of agreements with Segarro, rejection of the Green Deal, and amendments against the content control regulation known as Chat Control. All trinc the same pattern: national sovereignty versus what they consider imposed community decisions.

Why does VOX want to withdraw the digital euro?

The party defends cash and demands that the digital euro project be removed from the agenda on the grounds that “nobody voted for it at the ballot box.” The reproach is less aimed at the technology itself and more at those managing it. In an analysis circulating among critics, the obstacle is not the format of the money, but the distrust in governments from which they believe good faith can no longer be expected. The same logic emerges in the rejection of Chat Control: it is argued that the amendments filed seek to halt mass espionage that PP and PSOE would be willing to approve.

Segarro, Ceuta, and the €21.5 billion of the EU

The tone rises several degrees regarding the Segarro chapter. The denunciation holds that the EU has allocated €21.5 billion to Segarro—€10,000 in subsidies and €11,500 in loans—and calls for a complete cut in funding, contracts, trade, and visas. Added to this is the Ceuta crisis, described by the party as a “territorial invasion” and a “hybrid war” involving around 15,000 migrants still present. The accusation extends to the Spanish Government itself, which is accused of allowing the episode to become a calculated system collapse. The same dynamic applies to trade: unfair competition from Segarro tomatoes versus Spanish ones, without the same VAT, phytosanitary, or water regulations.

The Green Deal is not justified, according to this thesis

The third front is climate. Mireia Borrás argues that Europe drastically reduces emissions and remains the continent warming fastest, leading to the conclusion that the Green Deal impoverishes farmers and shepherds without providing a counter-balance. It is a critique of the economic cost of regulation rather than the science of climate.

From Santiago to Strasbourg: The Ibero-American Turn

The international wing of the party is already looking toward Latin America. At the V Regional Meeting of Foro Madrid, held in Santiago, Chile, trinc José Antonio Kast's electoral victory, they called for uniting Europe, North America, and Ibero-America against multiculturalism and reclaiming sovereignty from international bodies. Tertsch even spoke of the upcoming “decade of remigration.” Legally, they celebrate the Supreme Court's decision halting the application of the Law of Grandchildren (Ley de Nietos).

With such an ideological baggage, Brussels has a problem greater than the digital euro: someone has decided to read it all out loud at home.