You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Voting left is a moral duty, viral post claims — the facts say otherwise
A viral tweet claims most immigrants vote for Sánchez and calls for their deportation if the right wins. Spanish election studies do not measure voting by origin.
There is no public data to support the claim that most immigrants vote for the PSOE, Spain's Socialist Party, not least because polls do not break down voting by country of birth. Proposing to deport a group over their supposed vote has no legal basis in Spain.
A message posted on X claims that "most immigrants will vote for Sánchez" and that, if the right comes to power, it should deport them because they vote for the left in their countries of origin. The text adds that without this "pool of votes" the PSOE would be left without an electoral base. The claim mixes an electoral prediction with a proposal for expulsion and rests on a premise that is not backed by any public data.
## What is known about how immigrants vote
Spanish election polls do not publish voting estimates broken down by country of birth or country of origin nationality. Barometers from the CIS, Spain's official polling institute, do record place of birth as a variable, but they offer no cross-tabulations that would allow anyone to claim a group votes overwhelmingly for one particular party. Nor is there any public record linking voting choices to migration status.
The premise of the tweet is therefore an unsourced generalization. Attributing a uniform vote to millions of people based on their origin is something electoral statistics itself warns against: voting depends on income, age, habitat and many other variables that cannot be reduced to nationality.
## Deporting people over their vote has no legal basis
The proposal to expel a group over their supposed voting behavior clashes with the Spanish and European legal framework. The Spanish Constitution recognizes suffrage as a right of Spanish citizens, and Spain's immigration law regulates expulsion only for specific causes that do not include voting. The European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights prohibit collective expulsions.
No European democracy contemplates deportation as a tool of electoral engineering. The idea also stems from a frequent confusion: most foreign residents in Spain do not have the right to vote in general elections, so they can hardly constitute a "pool of votes" in the sense the message suggests.
## Why this kind of claim matters
The tweet is not an isolated case, but an example of how narratives are built that attribute homogeneous voting blocs to entire groups. This kind of oversimplification fuels proposals that, presented as common sense, do not stand up to scrutiny against either the data or the law. When a claim like this circulates without figures or sources, it is worth remembering that the burden of proof lies with whoever makes it.
Decisions about who can vote and who can be expelled from a country are made within the framework of existing law, not on the basis of unsupported electoral predictions. Any serious migration debate should start from verifiable data and the applicable rules.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (6 replies).
In Spain, abstention doesn't affect seat allocation under the D'Hondt system. Yet, some view not voting as a moral imperative against political legitimacy.
**Víctor de Aldama**, known for his connection to the Negreira case, appears on Spanish television to clarify matters and accuse others of lying. What will he reveal?