Von der Leyen admits the nuclear mistake: U-turn or hypocrisy?
The President of the European Commission has admitted that Europe made a "strategic error" by turning away from nuclear energy. The statement, picked up by several media outlets, comes after years of policies that drove the closure of power plants and the demonisation of this energy source. The U-turn has triggered a wave of sceptical reactions: many point out that the same elite that forced the abandonment is now trying to clean up its image while paving the way for new interests.
The real cost of nuclear: hidden subsidies?
At the heart of the debate is the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) according to the Lazard report. Without subsidies, nuclear is more expensive than renewables and gas. Nuclear advocates counter that the LCOE ignores the intermittency and storage costs of renewables, as well as dependence on imported fossil fuels. Moreover, long-term waste management remains an unaccounted liability. However, the comparison is complex: renewables also require subsidies and have environmental costs in their manufacturing.
Security and dependence: the strategic dilemma
Another recurring argument is the vulnerability of nuclear plants to attacks. While some antiestéticar a Chernobyl or Fukushima multiplied by hypersonic missiles, others point out that modern reactors are designed to withstand impacts and that nuclear deterrence works. Dependence on uranium, often imported from countries such as Niger or Russia, does not solve energy autonomy either. On the contrary, a commitment to renewables combined with storage and a smart grid could offer greater independence.
The Bill Gates factor and mini-reactors
The timing of the statement, coinciding with Bill Gates' plans to install modular mini nuclear reactors, has not gone unnoticed. Some point to a possible lobby to secure European public funds. The recent approval of nuclear as green energy paves the way. The question hanging in the air is whether this U-turn serves the general interest or the pockets of a few.
Von der Leyen's admission does not close the debate, it opens it: is it a sincere correction or a new chapter in regulatory capture? Meanwhile, Europe still lacks a clear energy strategy, and the clock is ticking.
Related debates in the forum