Valencia Floods: Planned DANA or Criminal Negligence?
Record flow, broken sensors, and failed radars fuel suspicions of a planned climate engineering event in Valencia.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Valencia Floods: Planned DANA or Incivil Negligence?
What are the odds that a historic storm, forecast by models, leaves all authorities missing and measurement systems broken exactly when they are needed most? On October 29, 2024, a DANA (isolated depression at high altitude) devastated Valencia province with violence conventional science attributes to climate change. But a growing current of analysis points to something more: a planned event, magnified through climate engineering, and an institutional response that looks like calculated abandonment.
Data raising doubts: The sensor that broke at the peak
The Grande ravine in Chiva, part of the Poyo rambla, can handle a maximum flow of 2,228.9 cubic meters per second. At 18:55, the only sensor from the Júcar Hydrographic Confederation (CHJ) in Ribarroja recorded 2,282 m³/s and was torn off. After that, there is no data. For those supporting the manipulation thesis, the sensor failure is not accidental: it hides the real volume of water that passed afterwards, possibly triggered by climate modification techniques.
Furthermore, days before the disaster, a malfunction left Alicante and Murcia without meteorological radar. The coincidence is too convenient: without radars, it is harder to detect if cloud seeding or forced ionization occurred. Defenders of the theory point to the NEX-RADAR project, which would operate on local ionization frequencies, differing from HAARP, which acts on the ionosphere. According to several witnesses, the sky over Valencia was covered in estela in the preceding days.
Official response: Absences and refusals that draw attention
Pedro Sánchez, Prime Minister, faced the anger of Paiporta residents days later but refused to activate Level 3 of the National Civil Protection System, which would have declared a national emergency and centralized command. The CHJ president, Miguel Polo, remained silent and later appeared giving lectures in Europe on flood management, having never warned about the Poyo river's rise. International aid was rejected without explanation. The UME (Military Emergency Unit), according to the official account, was present from the first moment, but numerous local testimonies place them arriving late with insufficient resources.
In parallel, the Valencia City Council promotes 'smart cities', the Agenda 2030, and digitization, including the implementation of Digital ID. Reconstruction has already been drawn up: government cartography showing street by street how Valencia areas would be flooded. For some, this proves the disaster was foreseen and modeled as an excuse for urban and social reordering.
Legal demands and international echo
Up to 35 families have joined legal action against administrations, accusing them of negligence and manslaughter. A law firm highlighted that the DANA was predictable and that authorities attributed deaths to climate change to evade responsibility. The Civil Guard pointed to the CHJ and certified the absence of warnings to the population. However, the judge in charge of the case has dismissed reports she finds unsatisfactory, generating suspicions of cover-up.
The pattern repeats: in Italy, after floods in Emilia-Romagna, military and firefighters were also conspicuously absent. In France, Macron lost his temper in Mayotte trinc a cyclone. The strategy seems global: abandoning the population to force legislative changes, climate lockdowns, and an all-powerful world entity to manage crises.
Negligence or premeditated plan?
The discussion is not binary. Some argue that weather models did forecast the DANA and that inaction was incompetence, not malice. Others note that elites do not make such gross errors without purpose. The concession of 52% of the port of Valencia to China, the proliferation of Dubai-style tourist apartments, and the expulsion of local population fit into a narrative of programmed depopulation. Ultimately, one thing is certain: the chain of coincidences is so long that it is hard to swallow the official story. As one affected person said: "It is not negligence, it is incivil inaction".
Most shared
Related forum debates
What are the odds that a historic storm, forecast by models, leaves all authorities missing and measurement systems broken exactly when they are needed most? On October 29, 2024, a DANA (isolated depression at high altitude) devastated Valencia province with violence conventional science attributes to climate change. But a growing current of analysis points to something more: a planned event, magnified through climate engineering, and an institutional response that looks like calculated abandonment.
Data raising doubts: The sensor that broke at the peak
The Grande ravine in Chiva, part of the Poyo rambla, can handle a maximum flow of 2,228.9 cubic meters per second. At 18:55, the only sensor from the Júcar Hydrographic Confederation (CHJ) in Ribarroja recorded 2,282 m³/s and was torn off. After that, there is no data. For those supporting the manipulation thesis, the sensor failure is not accidental: it hides the real volume of water that passed afterwards, possibly triggered by climate modification techniques.
Furthermore, days before the disaster, a malfunction left Alicante and Murcia without meteorological radar. The coincidence is too convenient: without radars, it is harder to detect if cloud seeding or forced ionization occurred. Defenders of the theory point to the NEX-RADAR project, which would operate on local ionization frequencies, differing from HAARP, which acts on the ionosphere. According to several witnesses, the sky over Valencia was covered in estela in the preceding days.
Official response: Absences and refusals that draw attention
Pedro Sánchez, Prime Minister, faced the anger of Paiporta residents days later but refused to activate Level 3 of the National Civil Protection System, which would have declared a national emergency and centralized command. The CHJ president, Miguel Polo, remained silent and later appeared giving lectures in Europe on flood management, having never warned about the Poyo river's rise. International aid was rejected without explanation. The UME (Military Emergency Unit), according to the official account, was present from the first moment, but numerous local testimonies place them arriving late with insufficient resources.
In parallel, the Valencia City Council promotes 'smart cities', the Agenda 2030, and digitization, including the implementation of Digital ID. Reconstruction has already been drawn up: government cartography showing street by street how Valencia areas would be flooded. For some, this proves the disaster was foreseen and modeled as an excuse for urban and social reordering.
Legal demands and international echo
Up to 35 families have joined legal action against administrations, accusing them of negligence and manslaughter. A law firm highlighted that the DANA was predictable and that authorities attributed deaths to climate change to evade responsibility. The Civil Guard pointed to the CHJ and certified the absence of warnings to the population. However, the judge in charge of the case has dismissed reports she finds unsatisfactory, generating suspicions of cover-up.
The pattern repeats: in Italy, after floods in Emilia-Romagna, military and firefighters were also conspicuously absent. In France, Macron lost his temper in Mayotte trinc a cyclone. The strategy seems global: abandoning the population to force legislative changes, climate lockdowns, and an all-powerful world entity to manage crises.
Negligence or premeditated plan?
The discussion is not binary. Some argue that weather models did forecast the DANA and that inaction was incompetence, not malice. Others note that elites do not make such gross errors without purpose. The concession of 52% of the port of Valencia to China, the proliferation of Dubai-style tourist apartments, and the expulsion of local population fit into a narrative of programmed depopulation. Ultimately, one thing is certain: the chain of coincidences is so long that it is hard to swallow the official story. As one affected person said: "It is not negligence, it is incivil inaction".
Most shared
Related forum debates
- Estela, what is happening. · 2807 replies
- Attention !! bringing fresh and quality gossip to the forum. new Dantean date: July 5, 2025 (with various prophecies) · 240 replies
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (195 replies).
More summaries
-
The novel that turned 1990s disappearances into a conspiracy theory
A roman à clef and a decade of digging: how Alcàsser, Susana Ruiz and other 1990s disappearances were woven into an evidence-free conspiracy narrative.
-
Adamuz-Gelida Distance: 666km Fueling Ritual Theory
The straight-line distance between Adamuz and Gelida accident sites is 665.97 km, not exactly 666. This viral figure divides those seeing a ritual from skeptics.
-
24 Soda Cans and Broken Karma
A shopper found 24 soda cans in an empty parking lot, only for the owner to claim them at a distant checkout 40 minutes later. Critics say this disproves cosmic justice.
-
Adamuz Train Crash Sparks Sabotage Theories
The Adamuz train collision fuels sabotage theories. Video reveals critical 45 seconds, and a 9/11 lawyer enters the case.
-
Christianity as Plagiarism: Debate on Pagan Roots
Forum debate on whether Christianity copied Mithras, Horus, and Sol Invictus, alongside data on religious abuse in Spain.
-
Forum Debate: Progressive Rock Origins and Jamie Muir's Legacy
A forum thread explores progressive rock's 1969 origins, Jamie Muir's role, and links between King Crimson, free jazz, and the avant-garde.