Undercover agents at protests: the video reigniting the policing debate
A video more than a decade old resurfaces amid an escalating wave of demonstrations and raises an uncomfortable question again: how far will the state go to discredit protesters? The footage shows a man being arrested by police while shouting "I'm a comrade, damn it!", a phrase that for many proves the existence of infiltrated agents provocateurs.
The clip, circulating on social media since 2020, shows a man dressed in black being arrested in the heat of a protest. As officers restrain him, he insists he is a "comrade", fuelling suspicion that he was an undercover police officer. The debate is nothing new: in Spain, the so-called "Sherwood Syndrome" —a tactic documented in the master's thesis of former Mossos senior commander David Piqué— describes precisely the strategy of infiltrating officers to provoke violence and justify repression.
Supporters of the theory argue that, without police complicity, the escalation of riots at certain demonstrations would make no sense. They point to the "Surround the Congress" episode in 2012, where supposed hotheads appeared with freshly bought flags and chanted slogans without conviction. The overlap in profiles and ages between those groups and later detainees reinforces the thesis of a directed operation.
Sceptics, however, reply that the original video dates from 2010, with no clear context, and that infiltration accusations are part of the folklore of protest. What is verifiable is the multimillion-euro spending on police operations during the demonstrations, a cost rarely detailed in the budgets of the Ministry of the Interior.
Amid links to tweets deleted for "censorship" and references to the "Sanchist dictatorship", an uncomfortable fact emerges: if there really were orders not to act during the return of Spain (the exhumation of Franco's remains), as a police union denounced, the question is not only who infiltrates, but who lies.
Related discussions in the forum