Trump Proposes Renaming AI to 'Superintelligence'
Trump suggests renaming AI to 'Superintelligence' and labels current term users as enemies, per a viral tweet.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Trump Proposes Renaming AI to 'Superintelligence', Labels Non-Users as Enemies
Donald Trump has launched a poll proposing to replace the term "artificial intelligence" with "Superintelligence," warning via a widely shared tweet that he will consider anyone still using the current name an "enemy." The idea, reported by international media, arrives during a week dominated by debates on the technology's risks and has triggered mixed reactions. Some argue the proposal is not harmless: it would shift the mental framework used to discuss the technology.
What Exactly Does Trump Propose With the Name Change?
The US president launched a poll on Saturday to rebrand artificial intelligence. Alternatives considered include "Superior Intelligence (SI)," "Extreme Intelligence (EI)," and "Supreme Intelligence (SI)." According to his own rationale, the new name should be "a much more elegant and accurate description of this new phenomenon." The announcement comes amid growing public discussion about AI risks and its impact on employment.
Some argue the terminology change is not just a whim. Changing the name changes the frame: "artificial intelligence" evokes robots, job losses, risks, and regulation; "superintelligence" emphasizes power, innovation, and technological leadership. It is a textbook political move, and some analysts read it as an attempt to control the language surrounding tech debates ahead of upcoming elections.
Why the Word Choice Is Not Neutral
The debate over the correct term has been open for years. Some technical analysis argues that what we call artificial intelligence is not intelligence at all: at best, it is an advanced data processor. The term "artificial" accurately describes its non-natural, human-made origin without judging whether it is superior or inferior. For others, intelligence requires free will; without it, it is merely a program.
The issue has clear economic implications. Some claim the use of the term AI has inflated tech companies' stock valuations far above their real value. Switching the narrative to "superintelligence" adds a layer of almost religious mystique. Some describe the phenomenon as a religious shift: AI as the new god and its critics as heretics to be persecuted. The Edict of Thessalonica in 380, which established Nicene Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire, is cited as a historical precedent for what may trinc.
The Technology's Real State: What It Can and Cannot Do
While politicians debate names, technical data points to existing but underutilized capabilities. A recent study indicates machines already have the technical capacity to perform 81% of jobs and 80% of work tasks, though mass replacement is not imminent. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman defends AI despite its risks with an argument that offers little optimism: "The world should accept some bad things."
Some assert that the Pentagon warned of these risks in a report from two years ago, according to cited sources. The combination of real technical capability, grandiose public discourse, and lack of effective regulation creates a landscape economists have long pointed out: the bubble is sustained as much by the narrative as by the technology itself.
Reactions: From Mockery to Serious Concern
The idea has generated varied reactions. A majority dismisses it as another outburst from the persona, symptomatic of decline or a distraction strategy. Others see it as a calculated political move to define the terrain of tech debate. A third, more unsettling view interprets it as a sign something is brewing: the choice of the word "superintelligence" would not be accidental, but preparatory.
Geopolitically, the episode is seen as another symptom of the deteriorating international position of the United States. The lingering question is whether such outbursts reinforce or weaken its technological leadership against China and Europe. Meanwhile, Europe moves toward hyper-regulation and tax pressure, which some analysts contrast with the message of technological power coming from Washington.
Is this just another smokescreen from the persona, or the first move in a strategy to control how we talk about the technology set to reshape jobs and capital in the next decade?
Donald Trump has launched a poll proposing to replace the term "artificial intelligence" with "Superintelligence," warning via a widely shared tweet that he will consider anyone still using the current name an "enemy." The idea, reported by international media, arrives during a week dominated by debates on the technology's risks and has triggered mixed reactions. Some argue the proposal is not harmless: it would shift the mental framework used to discuss the technology.
What Exactly Does Trump Propose With the Name Change?
The US president launched a poll on Saturday to rebrand artificial intelligence. Alternatives considered include "Superior Intelligence (SI)," "Extreme Intelligence (EI)," and "Supreme Intelligence (SI)." According to his own rationale, the new name should be "a much more elegant and accurate description of this new phenomenon." The announcement comes amid growing public discussion about AI risks and its impact on employment.
Some argue the terminology change is not just a whim. Changing the name changes the frame: "artificial intelligence" evokes robots, job losses, risks, and regulation; "superintelligence" emphasizes power, innovation, and technological leadership. It is a textbook political move, and some analysts read it as an attempt to control the language surrounding tech debates ahead of upcoming elections.
Why the Word Choice Is Not Neutral
The debate over the correct term has been open for years. Some technical analysis argues that what we call artificial intelligence is not intelligence at all: at best, it is an advanced data processor. The term "artificial" accurately describes its non-natural, human-made origin without judging whether it is superior or inferior. For others, intelligence requires free will; without it, it is merely a program.
The issue has clear economic implications. Some claim the use of the term AI has inflated tech companies' stock valuations far above their real value. Switching the narrative to "superintelligence" adds a layer of almost religious mystique. Some describe the phenomenon as a religious shift: AI as the new god and its critics as heretics to be persecuted. The Edict of Thessalonica in 380, which established Nicene Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire, is cited as a historical precedent for what may trinc.
The Technology's Real State: What It Can and Cannot Do
While politicians debate names, technical data points to existing but underutilized capabilities. A recent study indicates machines already have the technical capacity to perform 81% of jobs and 80% of work tasks, though mass replacement is not imminent. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman defends AI despite its risks with an argument that offers little optimism: "The world should accept some bad things."
Some assert that the Pentagon warned of these risks in a report from two years ago, according to cited sources. The combination of real technical capability, grandiose public discourse, and lack of effective regulation creates a landscape economists have long pointed out: the bubble is sustained as much by the narrative as by the technology itself.
Reactions: From Mockery to Serious Concern
The idea has generated varied reactions. A majority dismisses it as another outburst from the persona, symptomatic of decline or a distraction strategy. Others see it as a calculated political move to define the terrain of tech debate. A third, more unsettling view interprets it as a sign something is brewing: the choice of the word "superintelligence" would not be accidental, but preparatory.
Geopolitically, the episode is seen as another symptom of the deteriorating international position of the United States. The lingering question is whether such outbursts reinforce or weaken its technological leadership against China and Europe. Meanwhile, Europe moves toward hyper-regulation and tax pressure, which some analysts contrast with the message of technological power coming from Washington.
Is this just another smokescreen from the persona, or the first move in a strategy to control how we talk about the technology set to reshape jobs and capital in the next decade?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (57 replies).
More summaries
-
Spain's IMV to top €1,600 in 2027: how it compares to working
Spain's IMV to top €1,600 for the first time in 2027, reaching over 893,000 households: how it compares to a job
-
Spain: Pedro Sánchez insulted on national TV sparks debate
Burbuja.info analyzes the anti-Sánchez chant on Spanish TV, questioning if it reflects real anger or just futile noise against the electoral machine.
-
Spain Housing Prices Surge 14.3%, Consuming 60% of Family Income
In Spain, housing prices rose 14.3% in 2026, requiring 60% of family income in Madrid and Barcelona amid stalled new construction.
-
Spain's 40-year record: bans, not benefits
A forum challenge asks what Spain's government improved in 40 years; most answers cite cost-free prohibitions.
-
Eva Santolaria at 50: Eternal Youth Myth or Aging?
Online debate on Eva Santolaria's appearance at 50, contrasting nostalgia with harsh views on aging and beauty standards.
-
Catalan Child Welfare Agency Faces Scandal Over Four-Year Delay in Rape Investigation
A 12-year-old girl under Generalitat care was raped. A four-year investigation delay and fraud allegations highlight systemic failures in Spain's child protection.