US President Donald Trump has announced that his country will take control of the Strait of Hormuz and charge a 20% fee to all ships crossing it, as payment for "protection". The move comes after a military escalation with Iran that has shut the waterway since Sunday. Washington and Tehran exchanged attacks: the US launched airstrikes on Iran, and Tehran responded against Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait and Oman.
Trump's decision fits into his maximum pressure strategy on Iran, but several analysts point out that the toll could drive up shipping costs and make the oil passing through Hormuz more expensive. Meanwhile, China and Russia are watching closely: if the route becomes unviable, they could push for alternatives such as an overland corridor or routes around the Cape of Good Hope.
Some experts doubt the measure's viability, noting that past attempts to bypass Hormuz have failed. The open question is whether the toll will become a source of revenue or the trigger for a larger conflict.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (16 replies).
Two Japanese ships cross the Strait of Hormuz without escort while Trump demands war on Iran. Analysis challenges the official narrative, pointing to the real conflict: USA vs China.
Robert Pape calls the intervention in Iran the worst US strategic defeat since Vietnam, with the Strait of Hormuz under Iranian control and low-cost drones.
Brahim Gali links the PSOE to the 11M attacks via Pegasus, but the timeline doesn't align: NSO Group didn't exist in 2004. An analysis of the detail that challenges the narrative.
The Pope's visit to Spain alongside Sánchez reopens the dilemma: free speech or crime? The political and economic cost of insulting the Pontiff in the middle of the street.