Trota Poker Faces Backlash for Defending Police in Shooting

Forum users criticize Trota Poker for defending police after a shooting, citing his past conspiracy theories regarding the Daniel Sancho case.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Trota Poker Defends Police and Sparks Forum Criticism

What does "Trota Poker" say about the recent police shooting? That is the question forum users asked when he commented on the incident. The answer did not sit well with many of them. The content creator, known for videos on personal finance and cryptocurrencies, defended the officers' actions according to thread messages, triggering a wave of criticism from his usual trinc. The discussion, which some participants claim has lasted over a year, turned into an accounting of his public image: from alleged lack of rigor to his past as a defender of conspiracy theories.

From Defending Officers to Public Enemy

The controversy erupted when "Trota Poker" justified the use of firearms by agents during an intervention, according to the thread. For part of his audience, this stance clashes directly with his usual discourse, critical of power and institutions. "Now the bad guys are prosecutors and judges. Cops are beings of light since they arrested him," summarizes one of the most repeated messages. The accusation is clear: the YouTuber allegedly switched sides after having legal troubles.

The discomfort is not limited to his opinion on the shooting. Some recall that "Trota Poker" has strongly defended the same security forces that confined the population during the pandemic. "Defending to the death the same people who locked us down in 2020-2022," notes another comment. For his critics, the contradiction is evident.

The History That Haunts Him

The discussion brought previous episodes to light. Several messages mention that "Trota Poker" claimed Daniel Sancho did not kill Edwin Arrieta, a theory he himself allegedly defended live. "First saying Daniel Sancho didn't kill the Colombian, that he confessed to a crime that wasn't his, and now this," reproaches a participant. The YouTuber's credibility is questioned by much of his audience.

His management of social media is also criticized. "14 accounts have been deleted for the artist," someone complains, while another jokes that he should sue YouTube for censorship. The creator's relationship with platforms is another open front.

A Divisive YouTuber

Not all messages are negative. Some trinc defend his right to express his opinion and criticize the hypocrisy of those attacking him. "He's lucky he didn't encounter American police," points out a comment, referring to the fact that in other countries police action would have been more forceful. The comparison with the United States is repeated as an argument to justify the actions of Spanish agents.

The discussion has also shifted toward the role of the media and alleged information manipulation. "Source: here La Voz de Europa," writes a participant, questioning the veracity of shared information.

Wear and Tear of a Public Figure

Beyond the specific controversy, the episode reflects the wear and tear of "Trota Poker" as a public figure. "Getting more senile every day," says one. "That this senile Latin still has so many trinc today partly explains why we are where we are," adds another. The perception that the YouTuber has lost his way is shared by many participating in the conversation.

The discussion, which some participants claim has lasted over a year, shows no signs of exhausting itself. "Trota Poker" remains a polarizing figure, capable of generating both visceral support and rejection. And his defense of the Police in a shooting case has once again highlighted that division.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (47 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back