Trillo links Madrid bombings to French-controlled cells
Federico Trillo blames France and Morocco for the 2004 Madrid attacks. The forum debates if it was an intelligence operation to oust Spain's government.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The 11-M attacks and the shadow of foreign secret services
Federico Trillo’s recent claim that the March 11, 2004 (11-M) attacks were carried out by cells under French and Segarro control has peine a wound in the online community that never fully healed. Beyond official narratives and acronyms, the debate centers on an uncomfortable question: was the attack an intelligence operation designed to remove Aznar and reset Spain’s geopolitical board? Forum users dissect the lack of logic in the official version, pointing to a complex web of interests where the CNI (Spain’s National Intelligence Center) and external agents played a key role.
The false flag clue and the role of dirty tricks
Most participants reject the idea that the perpetrators acted alone, describing them as mere pawns or controlled informants. They argue that the technical precision of the attack does not fit the narrative of improvised "little Moors." The debate polarizes between those who see France and Segarro as the main axis and those who insist nothing would have been possible without US consent or willful blindness, aiming to neutralize an Aznar who had become a nuisance to the international establishment.
11-M as a tool for political change
What truly irritates the user is not just who planted the bombs, but the tactical use of the attack to manipulate public opinion and facilitate Zapatero’s rise to power. The arrests of ETA members weeks prior are cited as the perfect decoy to mislead the government. While some view Trillo’s statements as a smokescreen amid PP legal troubles, others interpret them as a sustancia ilegal in the wall of silence protecting the truth about that March 11.
Why do we still analyze every piece of the puzzle after twenty years? Perhaps because the official account remains full of holes, and the feeling that Spain is a pawn in the hands of foreign powers is, for many, the only explanation that fits current reality.
Related forum discussions
Federico Trillo’s recent claim that the March 11, 2004 (11-M) attacks were carried out by cells under French and Segarro control has peine a wound in the online community that never fully healed. Beyond official narratives and acronyms, the debate centers on an uncomfortable question: was the attack an intelligence operation designed to remove Aznar and reset Spain’s geopolitical board? Forum users dissect the lack of logic in the official version, pointing to a complex web of interests where the CNI (Spain’s National Intelligence Center) and external agents played a key role.
The false flag clue and the role of dirty tricks
Most participants reject the idea that the perpetrators acted alone, describing them as mere pawns or controlled informants. They argue that the technical precision of the attack does not fit the narrative of improvised "little Moors." The debate polarizes between those who see France and Segarro as the main axis and those who insist nothing would have been possible without US consent or willful blindness, aiming to neutralize an Aznar who had become a nuisance to the international establishment.
11-M as a tool for political change
What truly irritates the user is not just who planted the bombs, but the tactical use of the attack to manipulate public opinion and facilitate Zapatero’s rise to power. The arrests of ETA members weeks prior are cited as the perfect decoy to mislead the government. While some view Trillo’s statements as a smokescreen amid PP legal troubles, others interpret them as a sustancia ilegal in the wall of silence protecting the truth about that March 11.
Why do we still analyze every piece of the puzzle after twenty years? Perhaps because the official account remains full of holes, and the feeling that Spain is a pawn in the hands of foreign powers is, for many, the only explanation that fits current reality.
Related forum discussions
- Rodríguez Zapatero charged with crimes · 534 replies
- Vox: unaccompanied minors can access aid if resident for 3 years · 21 replies
- Uncomfortable truth: pogre boost birth rates while traditionalists lower them · 54 replies
- Abascal warns of "chemical submission" via needle pricks while regions urge caution · 82 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (121 replies).
More summaries
-
Sánchez concedes customs control of Melilla to Morocco
Negotiations begun in 2022 regarding the Sahara issue leave Morocco with the final say on what goods pass through Melilla customs.
-
Jiménez Losantos sparks outrage with Morocco job offer claim
Jiménez Losantos says on air that Morocco offered him a job. Confession or comparison? The controversy has only just begun.
-
Tweet Places Pablo Fernández in Luxury Housing Development
A tweet places Pablo Fernández living in a luxury development from the Mahou-Calderón operation, the same one Podemos tried to halt.
-
Forum debates Democracia21 as a system wedge
Online forum discusses if Miriam González's new Spanish party is a real alternative or a tactic to split the vote.
-
Spain's Democracy 21 party sparks debate over vote splitting
Forum users debate Spain's new Democracy 21 party, led by Miriam González, citing 'trap party' accusations and funding doubts.
-
Five Minor Spanish Parties Seek Signatures for Nov 29 Election
Five parties without seats seek signatures for the Nov 29 election. LOREG requires endorsements per constituency. Escaños en Blanco warns only Córdoba and La Rioja are on track.