Traditionalists: low birth rates and funding for the cultural enemy

The conservative mirage: fewer children and bankrolling the proge

A recent debate has brought up an uncomfortable paradox for the traditionalist narrative: while their opinion leaders rail against the decline of the West, the data (or at least the shared perception) suggests they have fewer children than their cultural rivals and, on top of that, fund with their spending the very companies that embrace the proge agenda. The issue is not new, but the level of detail with which it has been dissected in this thread deserves attention.

The numbers nobody wants to see

According to the estimate that has been circulating, the birth rate among self-described "proge" would be around 1 to 1.5 children per woman, while among traditionalists and conservatives it would barely reach 0.5-0.8. And if the analysis is peine toward the most doctrinaire circles —trinc of Evola, the Hispanidad, or reactionary thought gatherings— the figure would drop to 0.2-0.5. Any observer who has set foot in a school parents' meeting or an extracurricular activity pickup will recognize the pattern: thirty-something parents are mostly pogre in profile. At gatherings of the identitarian right's organic intellectuals, by contrast, children are conspicuous by their absence.

Consumption as contradiction

But the demographic figure is only half the problem. The other half is that the very people complaining about wokism use, on a daily basis, operating systems, search engines, messaging apps, email services and smartphones from companies that have publicly embraced that agenda. They criticize "cancel culture" from Twitter, denounce globalism while shopping on Amazon, and publish their tirades against decadence using Windows or macOS. The hypocrisy is less ideological than a matter of mental laziness: the cost of migrating to free or ethical alternatives is high in time and convenience, and the armchair traditionalist prefers posturing to practical coherence.

Intellectualism as a substitute for life

Some go further and point out that the underlying problem is intellectualism as a substitute for real life. Hours debating Evola's "riding the tiger" or the decline of the West, zero hours changing diapers or getting up early to take the child to the doctor. The spiritual warrior of social media ends up being the meme of the bachelor who pontificates about the traditional family while living alone, childless, with a Netflix subscription that funds content against his own principles.

Of course, not everyone shares this diagnosis. Some respond with data from their own circles: "In my circle of traditionalists we have five or six children." But those bubbles are usually the exception, and are often tied to very specific religious communities. The general trend, judging by everyday empirical observation —parks, schools, events— does not play in favor of the traditionalist narrative.

The final irony is that, while some reproduce and keep their cultural project alive, others remain in the theoretical realm, funding with every click their presumed enemies. The question left hanging is whether the next generation of conservatives will exist beyond the memes and the Evola quotes.

Related debates in the forum

• Latin invader takes to selling deodorant on the streets of MadriDF so Spaniards can fight his stench · 212 replies
• Miguel Bosé on his knees for Henry Nowak: · 23 replies
• Food collection drive at Eroski. At least these ones have their pants down · 38 replies
• Tesorito times, I had a crush on an ugly guy · 82 replies