Topuria: Visualization, Hard Work, and Genetics

Visualization isn't enough: The Topuria factor

Ilia Topuria won the UFC Antiestéticatherweight World Championship. The news alone explains nothing. What it brings to the table is an uncomfortable question: was it hard work, visualization, or a mix of both? The fighter himself hinted at this in an interview on Jordi Wild's channel: he stated that no one could withstand training at his pace for even a week, and his approach differs significantly from normal people. "I am where I am and others are not," he implies. He adds that he visualizes what he will win, though he refuses to give details. Those familiar with the Law of Assumption know what he means.

The problem is that this explanation doesn't hold up under serious scrutiny. Because if visualization were the decisive variable, the championship would be won by whoever best imagined victory, not whoever fights best. And that doesn't happen.

What is the Law of Assumption and why is it cited here?

The Law of Assumption, in its popular version, holds that what a person assumes with conviction as already peine eventually materializes. It is not simple fantasy: its defenders speak of feeling the scene as real, feeding the subconscious with a repeated narrative until conviction dominates. In Topuria's case, those defending this reading point out that the fighter describes exactly that process: he visualizes the result before it occurs.

The most repeated counterargument is devastatingly simple: everyone who has ever put on gloves has imagined themselves world champion. Everyone who has bounced a ball has seen themselves in the NBA. Everyone who has written two lines has imagined signing a bestseller. Visualization is universal; success is not. If it were the key, anyone with enough imagination would win the championship.

Hard work as the main variable

The dominant thesis in the analysis is that visualization is, at most, a multiplier. Michael Jordan summed it up better than anyone: "the more I train, the luckier I get". Luck is provoked. And provocation is called hours, sweat, and repetition.

There is a data point often cited in these contexts: studies with two control groups, one physically practicing a task and the other only visualizing it, show small differences in improvement between both after a few weeks. The brain does not fully distinguish vivid imagination from real experience. That is what some participants argue. But it is also true that visualization does not break natural laws: if someone is missing a leg, it does not grow back. If someone has cancer and visualizes being cured, they do not get cured because of it.

The nuance matters: visualization can serve to implant a goal in the subconscious and maintain motivation when the body asks to stop. Not to replace training.

The argument of the rival who also visualizes

Here is the point that disorients the most enthusiastic. If two fighters reach the final with the same iron attitude and the same visualization capacity, one of them loses anyway. And not because they visualized worse, but because the other was better that day. Visualization does not distribute medals.

The example of the Simpsons episode about Joan of Arc has been used to illustrate this: God orders Joan to lead the French to victory, and orders the English soldier exactly the same thing for the English. Someone is lying, or no one has a monopoly on revelation.

The factor almost no one wants to look at: talent and genetics

There is a variable mentioned less often because it is uncomfortable: without elite genetics and innate aptitudes, you do not reach the UFC no matter how much visualization you practice. You can train endurance, technique, diet. You cannot train height, wingspan, or recovery capacity.

Talent is not everything, but it sets the ceiling. And that ceiling is different for each person. Visualization does not raise it; at most, it helps you get closer to it.

The context surrounding the champion

In the interview with Ferran Torres, a Barcelona player, Topuria was described as surrounded by people who constantly flatter him, with everything designed for his well-being. That is not visualization: it is environment. An ecosystem that protects the athlete from distractions and allows them to focus exclusively on their goal.

That factor, less mystical and more prosaic, probably explains more than any exercise of imagination. Surrounding yourself with the right people, having an agent who negotiates well, choosing the correct club or promoter: that does make measurable differences.

---

The question remains without a closed answer. Topuria won, and that is a fact. Whether it was due to hard work, visualization, or a combination of both with a percentage no one knows how to calculate, is a discussion that will probably never be resolved. What can be affirmed is that visualizing without training leads nowhere, and that training without believing in oneself is usually not enough either. The rest is literature.