You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
To every true professional out there...
Getting an order that skips procedure confirmed in writing is a widespread practice. If something goes wrong, responsibility usually falls on whoever carried it out.
When a superior asks you to skip a procedure, it is wise to demand the order in writing and record your refusal. Without that backup, the failure ends up being attributed to whoever executed the order.
There is a scene that plays out in many workplaces: someone with years of experience receives a request that clashes with procedure. It does not arrive in writing or in a formal meeting. It arrives in a corridor, in a hurry, with the deadline as the argument. If the work succeeds, the credit is shared out upstairs. If something fails, the blame trickles down on its own.
## The verbal order nobody remembers
The pattern is familiar. The manager asks to shorten a check, skip a validation or sign off on something that has not been verified. They do it discreetly, leaving no trace, with deadline pressure as their alibi. When the problem surfaces, that same manager does not remember asking for anything.
The asymmetry is the heart of the matter. The person executing assumes the technical risk and, often, the legal one too. The person giving the order keeps their distance and the recognition. In sectors with regulated procedures, that distance can turn an informal order into a serious employment problem for the employee.
## Written backup as a defence
The advice circulating among professionals is simple: ask for written confirmation of any instruction that skips the procedure. An email, an internal note, a confirmation in the company's messaging system. If the order does not come in writing, it does not get carried out.
It is not a magic formula. In many companies, refusing a verbal order comes at a cost. But the document changes the position of both the person who requests it and the person who receives it. It makes clear who ordered it, when, and exactly what was asked for. With that, the chain of responsibility stops being a matter of opinion.
## When the procedure exists for a reason
Procedures are not decorative bureaucracy. They usually stem from past failures, audits or legal rules. Skipping them to gain a few days can work right up until it stops working. And then the cost is not measured in days.
The caution applies to any sector: healthcare, transport, banking, industry. Deadline pressure is real, and middle managers feel it too. But written backup is the only thing that separates a shared decision from individual blame.
If the situation affects your employment rights or legal responsibilities, it is advisable to consult a union representative or an employment lawyer before acting.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (9 replies).
A pensioner says in a viral video that he will not hand over his pension to the PP and VOX over the train accidents. The gesture mixes rail grievances and voting.
Spain's October CPI comes in at 4.9%, three tenths short of triggering the MEI surcharge. Italian inflation stands at 5.4% and the ECB keeps rates at 2.5%.