Thread on Roberto Gamboa Deleted

A thread with 900 critical reviews of Roberto Gamboa was removed. Analysis of potential legal intervention and its impact on the community.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The Disappearance of the Thread on Roberto Gamboa

A massive debate regarding Roberto Gamboa's business practices has been deleted from the platform. The absence of over 900 comments questioning the validity of the Trafficker Digital master's program has generated widespread suspicion of external interference.

The thread, which accumulated more than 100,000 views, contained fierce criticism of the marketing techniques used by Gamboa. Participants pointed out a pattern of excessively positive opinions on other channels, suggesting strict control of the digital narrative. The abrupt removal of the content has been interpreted as a brand protection measure.

The community attributes the disappearance to the receipt of a burofax (a certified legal notice in Spain) by the forum administration. This legal tool, used to demand the immediate removal of content, would have triggered a defensive reaction from the platform. The risk of defamation or business damage lawsuits is presented as the main driver of the censorship.

An article by El Diario.es titled "The IT specialist who recruits 'unhappy Spaniards'" expanded the criticism, describing the model as a cult. Its front-page placement on Meneame consolidated the scandal's visibility before it was erased. The community argues that the deletion of the thread is further proof of the business's opacity.

Users point out that the cost of €5,000 for a master's degree, compared to free resources, is at the heart of the dispute. The accusation of fraud is based on the difference between perceived value and the price charged. The disappearance of the debate prevents access to this critical information for new prospects.

The situation reflects the tension between freedom of opinion and the legal protection of companies. The community maintains that censorship hides a negative reality about the master's program. Finding reliable training alternatives has become more complex without the original thread.

The future of the discussion on Gamboa depends on the community's ability to preserve the information. The disappearance of the thread has not stopped the criticism but has hindered access to concrete evidence. The community hopes that social pressure will keep the scandal visible.



The deletion of the thread is a clear symptom of the fragility of public discourse. The community continues to seek reliable training alternatives. The debate on ethics in digital marketing remains open.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (81 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back