You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The World Cup nobody seems to care about (or almost)
The World Cup is met with more indifference than passion: former fans who would rather have a beer, hopes of a pro-USA fix, and a shrinking fanbase. Data from a fo
The World Cup nobody cares about (except to watch USA win)
With eleven days to go until the World Cup kicks off, the mood is not one of football fever but of near-universal indifference. Among those who used to watch every match, many now prefer beers and doritos over the ball. Others openly admit they think football is "a crap sport" and walk away whenever it comes up in conversation.
The burnout of the lifelong fan
Most comments reflect an apathy that is not just a passing phase. Even self-described former footballers confess that the World Cup leaves them completely cold. Some only watch football during the tournament, but their numbers keep shrinking. The saturation of matches, the financial interests and the feeling that everything is rigged have taken their toll.
Hoping for a (Yankee) surprise
Amid the general indifference, an ironic current is emerging: hoping that the United States team, given the current political climate, lifts the trophy amid a refereeing scandal. It is less about love of the sport than a desire to watch the official narratives burn. "It would be hilarious," reads one comment, though most would settle for the favorites crashing out early.
A polarized fanbase
Political references creep in: some accuse the left of hypocrisy, others accuse the right of exploiting the situation. But what dominates is the feeling that the World Cup no longer brings people together. For a growing share of the population, it is just another event, without the magic of yesteryear. The question is no longer who will win, but whether anyone will watch.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (38 replies).