The train conspiracy: Adamuz, Urda and the sabotage narrative

The train conspiracy: when the track breaks and so does the story

A 350-tonne train at 200 km/h against a 15-tonne bogie at 80. The calculation, thrown out casually in a digital bar-room chat, produces a hair-raising result: the light train is flung more than 200 metres. It is the image many people have in their heads after the Adamuz crash, where an Alvia collided with the tail cars of an Iryo that, according to initial accounts, had encroached on its track. But nine months later, the questions remain unanswered and the conspiracy theories keep multiplying. The latest one: there was no direct impact between the trains, and the Alvia derailed because of infrastructure disturbed by the Iryo. Where does reality end and the smoke begin?

Adamuz: the crash that was never solved

On 20 January, the Adamuz crash (Córdoba) left unforgettable images: a wrecked Alvia and a virtually intact Iryo. The difference in damage fuelled all kinds of speculation. "I can't picture a train crash where one ends up so far from the other, one wrecked and the other completely fine," sums up the general feeling. The most repeated technical explanation: the Iryo lost its two rear cars, which ended up on the opposite track; the Alvia, travelling at over 200 km/h, ploughed into them. Inertia did the rest. But the conspiracy machine was already in motion.

The initial investigation pointed to a failure in the track welds, made with thermite, a compound that, according to some, can also be used to cut them. From there to sabotage is just one step. And someone took it: "Everything pointed to a thermite welding failure on the tracks. Or a track cut with thermite, which also works for cutting, in case it had been sabotage." The shadow of 9/11 looms over the conversation: "it's said, it's rumoured, that the Twin Towers were brought down with thermite."

The no-impact theory and the torn-off bogie

The latest twist came with the publication of aerial images by the Guardia Civil (Spanish paramilitary police). They show how the collision shifted the Alvia several dozen metres. But some observers see no sufficient impact damage on the Iryo: "to me it should show a strong impact, not just apparent scrapes on the side." Hence the hypothesis that the trains never collided directly and that the Alvia derailed because of infrastructure disturbed by the Iryo. A theory that, according to its supporters, would explain why one train was wrecked and the other was not.

The bogie torn off the Iryo is another key piece. "The torn-off bogie doesn't suggest that. It seems to me someone is trying to impose hypotheses leading to the conclusion that the crash's origin was not the track itself but a drag caused by the Iryo," one voice notes. The Renfe drivers' strike called for 9, 10 and 11 February adds more fuel to the fire: coincidence or smokescreen?

FITUR week and the festival of accidents

The trickle of rail incidents in the trinc weeks has been relentless. Two more crashes in Catalonia (Girona and Barcelona), two new collisions in Asturias and Cartagena, a tram hitting a bus in Tenerife, a spark setting a tram roof on fire in Valencia... The list grows and so do the theories. "We are the unchosen people, friends. The name gave it away: sPAIN," one person jokes. Another points to the coincidence with FITUR week: "Since tourism is a strategic sector for Spain, coincidentally..."

The official explanation involves climate change and greater media attention. "Between the heavy rain and you all paying more attention, we'll soon be at one crash a day," someone quips. But the accumulation of incidents is getting hard to ignore. And the shadow of sabotage lengthens: "Someone with a lot of power is sabotaging Spain, with the help of necessary collaborators."

666, the Twin Towers and Agenda 2030

The conspiracy has its own codes. The distance between Adamuz and Gelida is, according to a tweet, 666 kilometres. "Need I add anything more? No. Anyone who doesn't believe me can check it themselves on Google Maps," the message reads. The number of the beast as irrefutable proof that something dark is brewing. And there is no shortage of people linking the crash to 31 October, Halloween night, or to the Valencia floods (DANA).

Agenda 2030, the NWO and satanism come into play. "Agenda 2030, the NWO, satanism and the whole wide world of those who truly RULE have chosen Spain as the detonation point for EVERYTHING," one message declares. The rollout of AI in the railways is seen as an excuse to lay off workers: "Who can object to IMPLEMENTING AI across the entire Spanish railway even if half the workforce is laid off?" The human error narrative is repeated like a mantra.

The disappearance of evidence and the rush to scrap

One of the most controversial points is the handling of the evidence. The Alvia's locomotive was hastily scrapped, some claim: "They've already scrapped it. Though they said don't worry, the bodies had all been recovered." The comparison with the 11-M Madrid train bombings is inevitable: "Except that in that case it was Blue PSOE who scrapped them." And the concealment of 42 metres of track from the Adamuz crash joins the list of suspicions: "Adif is hiding 42 metres of track from the Adamuz crash, why? The same modus operandi repeats itself."

The official response, according to Transport, is that the exact kilometre point of the crash was mistaken, 12 metres from the one being investigated. An administrative error that, for conspiracy theorists, is further proof of the cover-up. "Destruction or disappearance of evidence. That is the real human error," they conclude.

Thermite denialism and the physics of materials

Not everyone buys the thermite sabotage story. A dissenting voice, that of an AI assistant, dismantles the theory: "I said thermite is for welding, not for sabotage. A pool of molten metal on the track does not weaken a joint in a controlled way so that it fails exactly when a train passes. That precision does not exist." And adds: "It would be like trying to bring down a building with a lighter: uncontrollable and absurd."

On the Twin Towers, the AI also offers a physical explanation: "Steel softens from 500-600 °C. Jet fuel burns at around 800-1000 °C. Once a few critical beams fail, collapse is inevitable." The strength of materials is not infinite. But the conversation keeps circling back to the possibility that thermite was used to weaken the track joints. "Also, as you said, thermite could have been used to weaken the track joints and maybe they found some of those pools," another replies.

The human factor and the war of narratives

Amid all the noise, there is a current pointing to something more prosaic: the deterioration of the infrastructure. "Anyone who has used the train regularly over the past decade gives no credence to a conspiracy theory, because they have lived through the accelerated decline in ride quality, punctuality and the state of the trains," one comment notes. Spanish high-estimulante ilegal rail needs a thorough overhaul: "What good is going 300 if the tracks break?"

The drivers' strike, the lack of maintenance and the pressure to keep to schedules paint a less epic but more worrying picture. AI and mass layoffs are emerging as the official solution: "We are witnessing a genuine persecution of Renfe and Adif workers." Human error is repeated as the catch-all explanation. And meanwhile, the question remains in the air: what really peine in Adamuz? And why does nobody seem willing to answer?

---

The train conspiracy is not just a forum phenomenon. It is the symptom of a growing distrust of institutions and official narratives. With every unexplained crash, with every piece of evidence that disappears, with every suspicious coincidence, the breeding ground thickens. The question is not whether there is a conspiracy, but why so many are willing to believe it.