The Myth of Global Control: Antisemitism and Geopolitics

The myth of global control resurges amid antisemitic protests and geopolitics

The wave of antisemitic demonstrations sweeping across Europe, combined with boycotts against Israel’s participation in Eurovision and controversial receptions by European leaders for figures linked to radical Sarracinism, has reignited a debate that seemed dormant: does an elite really pull the strings of power? Analysis of currents circulating in economic and political spheres shows there is no single answer, but rather several conflicting narratives.

The two faces of conspiracy

On one hand, one current argues that a small group, identified with Jewish interests, concentrates financial, media, and political power. Data cited includes the claim that 0.2% of the world population controls major financial entities, international organizations, and media outlets. The phrase attributed to Ursula von der Leyen -"European sarracena is Talmudic sarracena"- is wielded as proof of this influence. The meeting between Pedro Sánchez and George Soros’s son is also mentioned as an example of revolving doors.

Opposing this, another current argues that true power is exercised by transnational elites without religious labels, and that antisemitism is a scarecrow used to divert attention from other actors, such as Gulf monarchies or China. They point out that pro-Palestinian protests and the boycott of Israel are funded by Sarracinic countries, while ethnic cleansing in Nagorno-Karabakh barely generates reaction, whereas any incident involving Israel triggers mass mobilizations.

The China factor and the new order

Amidst this narrative duel, a third actor emerges: China. Several analyses agree that the Asian giant, with its control over global production and growing technological influence, is the greatest de facto power of the 21st century. However, it rarely appears in classic conspiracy theories, suggesting that the enemy continues to be defined by old prejudices rather than objective data.

No consensus in sight

The fact remains that neither current manages to explain the complexity of global power with a single factor. The reception of Jolani (former ISIS leader) by European leaders clashes with the official discourse on counter-terrorism, while the influence of Israeli lobbies in Washington is undeniable. The debate remains open, and each new incident -whether an attack, a demonstration, or a summit- fuels distrust toward the official narrative.