The Francoist myth of the cheap car: what the prices hide

The Seat 600 required a two-year wait and today's equivalent salaries; village houses sold for next to nothing. The difficult fit of the Francoist car myth.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The Seat 600 and the Swedish blonde: the economy of the Francoist myth

The Seat 600 was not a cheap car: it was a car condemned to waiting. It took a two-year queue and roughly the same number of salaries as today just to order one. Even so, the little runabout has become the icon of a Spain some people long for. The perfect complement to the story is the Swedish blonde in the passenger seat: the desire of a country that looked at Europe with ambition and at its own reality with an inferiority complex.

How many salaries did a car cost back then?

The doubt runs through every comparison. Some claim the price in salaries was similar to now; the difference lies in the wait. You ordered the 600 and years passed before you saw it. And when it arrived, it arrived complete: the suicide doors had more personality than any plastic SUV of today. But the wait was not a virtue: it was the symptom of a protected industry, running on foreign patents with no competition.

The price of a house: the real gap

The same story that praises the cars forgets housing. Village houses went for a pittance because nobody wanted to live in them; today they sell for dozens of times their value. City flats were expensive, and living on your own was a luxury for the few. There was no miracle: there was a transfer of rural misery into unequal urban planning. Whoever tells this story knows that Spain's development boom is not measured in pretty cars, but in the ability to decide where you live.

Seat, an exporter to Scandinavia, and the break with Fiat

That domestic industry even succeeded abroad: Seat was among the best-selling cars in the Nordic countries, until Fiat, annoyed, withdrew the patents and dissolved the partnership. The story of the Spanish car that temporarily conquered Sweden and fell because of its technological dependence should cool any autarkic enthusiasm. Without its Italian partner, the whole venture did not hold up. That is not autarky; it is an industrial colony.

The myth of the affordable car and the impossible blonde hides another question: if the economy worked so well, why did it take democracy to demand accountability? You can long for a car, but not for the country that would not let you drive it.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (29 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back