The faces of the 69 victims of the Urda tragedy in Spain

A viral tweet shows the faces of the 69 victims of the Urda tragedy in Spain and links them to "Óscar Gloria and Pedro Sánchez". The post criticizes those it believes are sharing these images for political gain.

The tweet that has reignited the conversation about the Urda tragedy is not a list of names or an official statement. It is an image with the faces of the **69 victims** and a caption attributing them to "Óscar Gloria and Pedro Sánchez". The post, shared on X, adds a direct rebuke against anyone who complains about these photos being published, considering it an attempt to score political points.

## A figure repeated without an official source

The number of **69 deaths** appears in the tweet as the central fact, but the post cites no report, official registry or statement to back it up. Nor does it identify the people in the images or say where the portraits came from. That absence of a source matters: a death toll can only be considered confirmed when the competent authority makes it public, and that has not peine here.

## A proper name as a political argument

The tweet turns two proper names into the explanation for the tragedy. "Óscar Gloria" is not an identifiable office or institution; "Pedro Sánchez" is Spain's Prime Minister. The framing suggests direct political responsibility without offering any supporting evidence. It is a common tactic on social media: replacing the explanation of an event with blame assigned to an adversary, so that the image of the victims serves to reinforce a partisan thesis.

## The rebuke aimed at those who criticize the sharing

The second part of the tweet attacks those who question the publication of the photos. The argument is that denouncing the political use of the images amounts to wanting to silence the victims. It is a familiar reversal: whoever points out opportunism becomes the one under scrutiny. Sharing the faces of the deceased without family consent raises ethical and legal questions that the tweet does not address.

## What can and cannot be claimed

The tweet offers no official confirmation about the identity of the **69 victims** or the causes of the disaster. Nor is there any record that the families authorized the publication of the portraits. Any claim about political responsibility or the exact death toll requires independent verification. Caution here is not a political stance: it is the least the victims deserve.